Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quality of Data in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.09400 v1 pith:HSLBHAKQ submitted 2021-12-17 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datamodelsexperimentlearningmachineaccuraciesassumptioncase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A common assumption exists according to which machine learning models improve their performance when they have more data to learn from. In this study, the authors wished to clarify the dilemma by performing an empirical experiment utilizing novel vocational student data. The experiment compared different machine learning algorithms while varying the number of data and feature combinations available for training and testing the models. The experiment revealed that the increase of data records or their sample frequency does not immediately lead to significant increases in the model accuracies or performance, however the variance of accuracies does diminish in the case of ensemble models. Similar phenomenon was witnessed while increasing the number of input features for the models. The study refutes the starting assumption and continues to state that in this case the significance in data lies in the quality of the data instead of the quantity of the data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comparative Study of Open-Source Libraries for Synthetic Tabular Data Generation: SDV vs. SynthCity

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On one energy-consumption dataset, Synthcity's Bayesian Network had the highest statistical fidelity and SDV's TVAE the best predictive utility at 1:10 scale, with no clear library winner.

Pith tools