REVIEW 1 cited by
Robust and Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the rapid demand of data and computational resources in deep learning systems, a growing number of algorithms to utilize collaborative machine learning techniques, for example, federated learning, to train a shared deep model across multiple participants. It could effectively take advantage of the resources of each participant and obtain a more powerful learning system. However, integrity and privacy threats in such systems have greatly obstructed the applications of collaborative learning. And a large amount of works have been proposed to maintain the model integrity and mitigate the privacy leakage of training data during the training phase for different collaborative learning systems. Compared with existing surveys that mainly focus on one specific collaborative learning system, this survey aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive review of security and privacy researches in collaborative learning. Our survey first provides the system overview of collaborative learning, followed by a brief introduction of integrity and privacy threats. In an organized way, we then detail the existing integrity and privacy attacks as well as their defenses. We also list some open problems in this area and opensource the related papers on GitHub: https://github.com/csl-cqu/awesome-secure-collebrative-learning-papers.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploiting Edge Features for Transferable Adversarial Attacks in Distributed Machine Learning
Intercepting intermediate features in split neural network inference lets black-box attackers build surrogate models whose adversarial examples transfer to the target far more often, e.g., 96% versus 61% success in on...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.