Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tractable Fragments of the Maximum Nash Welfare Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.10199 v2 pith:4U2RZZ34 submitted 2021-12-19 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords agentsvaluationswelfareallocationnashadditivegoodsproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the problem of maximizing Nash welfare (MNW) while allocating indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. The Nash welfare of an allocation is the weighted geometric mean of agents' utilities, and the allocation with maximum Nash welfare is known to satisfy several desirable fairness and efficiency properties. However, computing such an MNW allocation is NP-hard, even for two agents with identical, additive valuations. Hence, we aim to identify tractable classes that either admit a PTAS, an FPTAS, or an exact polynomial-time algorithm. To this end, we design a PTAS for finding an MNW allocation for the case of asymmetric agents with identical, additive valuations, thus generalizing a similar result for symmetric agents. Our techniques can also be adapted to give a PTAS for the problem of computing the optimal $p$-mean welfare. We also show that an MNW allocation can be computed exactly in polynomial time for identical agents with $k$-ary valuations when $k$ is a constant, where every agent has at most $k$ different values for the goods. Next, we consider the special case where every agent finds at most two goods valuable, and show that this class admits an efficient algorithm, even for general monotone valuations. In contrast, we note that when agents can value three or more goods, maximizing Nash welfare is NP-hard, even when agents are symmetric and have additive valuations, showing our algorithmic result is essentially tight. Finally, we show that for constantly many asymmetric agents with additive valuations, the MNW problem admits an FPTAS.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 8 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A Better-than-$e^{1/e}$ Approximation Algorithm for Nash Social Welfare under Additive Valuations

    cs.GT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An efficient randomized algorithm approximates max Nash social welfare under additive valuations by e^{1/e} - c for some c > 0 — the first improvement over the 2018 bound of Barman et al.

  2. Improved Algorithms for Nash Welfare in Linear Bandits

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FairLinBandit achieves order-optimal Nash regret Õ(d/√T) and the first sublinear p-mean regret bounds in linear bandits for every real p.

Pith tools