Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Stable Conformal Prediction Sets

Machine Learning · Submitted 19 Dec 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We demonstrate that our proposed confidence set does not lose any coverage guarantees while avoiding the need for data splitting as currently done in the literature.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2112.10224 (version 2)
Pith ID6AK2PM6J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEugene Ndiaye. "Stable Conformal Prediction Sets." arXiv:2112.10224 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/6AK2PM6J
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,316 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.67 · human participants 0.07 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.83 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

When one observes a sequence of variables $(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)$, Conformal Prediction (CP) is a methodology that allows to estimate a confidence set for $y_{n+1}$ given $x_{n+1}$ by merely assuming that the distribution of the data is exchangeable. CP sets have guaranteed coverage for any finite population size $n$. While appealing, the computation of such a set turns out to be infeasible in general, e.g. when the unknown variable $y_{n+1}$ is continuous. The bottleneck is that it is based on a procedure that readjusts a prediction model on data where we replace the unknown target by all its possible values in order to select the most probable one. This requires computing an infinite number of models, which often makes it intractable. In this paper, we combine CP techniques with classical algorithmic stability bounds to derive a prediction set computable with a single model fit. We demonstrate that our proposed confidence set does not lose any coverage guarantees while avoiding the need for data splitting as currently done in the literature. We provide some numerical experiments to illustrate the tightness of our estimation when the sample size is sufficiently large, on both synthetic and real datasets.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 When one observes a sequence of variables $(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)$, Conformal Prediction (CP) is a methodology that allows to estimate a confidence set for $y_{n+1}$ given $x_{n+1}$ by merely assuming that the distribution of the data is exchangeable. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 CP sets have guaranteed coverage for any finite population size $n$. background 0.98 0.07 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 While appealing, the computation of such a set turns out to be infeasible in general, e.g. when the unknown variable $y_{n+1}$ is continuous. background 0.59 0.15 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 The bottleneck is that it is based on a procedure that readjusts a prediction model on data where we replace the unknown target by all its possible values in order to select the most probable one. background 0.86 0.10 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 This requires computing an infinite number of models, which often makes it intractable. background 0.89 0.08 0.03 asserted 0.78
s5 In this paper, we combine CP techniques with classical algorithmic stability bounds to derive a prediction set computable with a single model fit. contribution 0.77 0.95 0.60 asserted 1.00
s6 We demonstrate that our proposed confidence set does not lose any coverage guarantees while avoiding the need for data splitting as currently done in the literature. result 0.83 0.93 0.55 asserted 1.00
s7 We provide some numerical experiments to illustrate the tightness of our estimation when the sample size is sufficiently large, on both synthetic and real datasets. contribution 0.42 0.96 0.07 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.71.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

When one observes a sequence of variables $(x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n)$, Conformal Prediction (CP) is a methodology that allows to estimate a confidence set for $y_{n+1}$ given $x_{n+1}$ by merely assuming that the distribution of the data is exchangeable. CP sets have guaranteed coverage for any finite population size $n$. While appealing, the computation of such a set turns out to be infeasible in general, e.g. when the unknown variable $y_{n+1}$ is continuous. The bottleneck is that it is based on a procedure that readjusts a prediction model on data where we replace the unknown target by all its possible values in order to select the most probable one. This requires computing an infinite number of models, which often makes it intractable. In this paper, we combine CP techniques with classical algorithmic stability bounds to derive a prediction set computable with a single model fit. We demonstrate that our proposed confidence set does not lose any coverage guarantees while avoiding the need for data splitting as currently done in the literature. We provide some numerical experiments to illustrate the tightness of our estimation when the sample size is sufficiently large, on both synthetic and real datasets.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 3 papers
  • Conformal prediction technique has been applied for designing uncertainty sets in active learning [ref] , anomaly detection [ref] , few shot learning [ref] , time series [ref] , robust optimization [ref] or to infer the performance guarantee for statistical learning algorithms [ref] .

    Validity, consonant plausibility measures, and conformal prediction · Introduction · 0.96

  • Conformal prediction technique has been applied for designing uncertainty sets in active learning [ref] , anomaly detection [ref] , few shot learning [ref] , time series [ref] , robust optimization [ref] or to infer the performance guarantee for statistical learning algorithms [ref] .

    Making learning more transparent using conformalized performance prediction · Introduction · 0.96

  • Conformal prediction technique has been applied for designing uncertainty sets in active learning [ref] , anomaly detection [ref] , few shot learning [ref] , time series [ref] , robust optimization [ref] or to infer the performance guarantee for statistical learning algorithms [ref] .

    Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-values · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.