Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Toward Educator-focused Automated Scoring Systems for Reading and Writing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.11973 v1 pith:SFWN4M6W submitted 2021-12-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords essayautomatedscoringlearningtechniqueswritingacrosschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents methods for improving automated essay scoring with techniques that address the computational trade-offs of self-attention and document length. To make Automated Essay Scoring (AES) more useful to practitioners, researchers must overcome the challenges of data and label availability, authentic and extended writing, domain scoring, prompt and source variety, and transfer learning. This paper addresses these challenges using neural network models by employing techniques that preserve essay length as an important feature without increasing model training costs. It introduces techniques for minimizing classification loss on ordinal labels using multi-objective learning, capturing semantic information across the entire essay using sentence embeddings to use transformer architecture across arbitrarily long documents, the use of such models for transfer learning, automated hyperparameter generation based on prompt-corpus metadata, and, most importantly, the use of semantic information to provide meaningful insights into student reading through analysis of passage-dependent writing resulting in state-of-the-art results for various essay tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. "All that Glitters": Approaches to Evaluations with Unreliable Model and Human Annotations

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Encoder models trained on noisy classroom ratings look super-human under standard concordance metrics, but generalizability, disattenuation, and hierarchical rater analyses show the apparent advantage is partly spurio...

Pith tools