REVIEW 2 cited by
Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Opinions are an integral part of how we perceive the world and each other. They shape collective action, playing a role in democratic processes, the evolution of norms, and cultural change. For decades, researchers in the social and natural sciences have tried to describe how shifting individual perspectives and social exchange lead to archetypal states of public opinion like consensus and polarization. Here we review some of the many contributions to the field, focusing both on idealized models of opinion dynamics, and attempts at validating them with observational data and controlled sociological experiments. By further closing the gap between models and data, these efforts may help us understand how to face current challenges that require the agreement of large groups of people in complex scenarios, such as economic inequality, climate change, and the ongoing fracture of the sociopolitical landscape.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Social Contagion in COVID-19 Discussions within the Belgian Reddit Community: A Statistical and Modeling Study
In r/Belgium, COVID-19 topics were seeded by external events, not by prior posts, but comment sentiment was contagious, and a two-layer bounded confidence model best captured that asymmetry.
-
Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey
A survey of online social media research argues the field is fragmented and must move toward comparative, data-validated models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.