Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Defeat of the Winograd Schema Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.02387 v3 pith:JU5S5GXC submitted 2022-01-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords challengeschemawinograddiscussresearchaccuracyachievedassessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Winograd Schema Challenge - a set of twin sentences involving pronoun reference disambiguation that seem to require the use of commonsense knowledge - was proposed by Hector Levesque in 2011. By 2019, a number of AI systems, based on large pre-trained transformer-based language models and fine-tuned on these kinds of problems, achieved better than 90% accuracy. In this paper, we review the history of the Winograd Schema Challenge and discuss the lasting contributions of the flurry of research that has taken place on the WSC in the last decade. We discuss the significance of various datasets developed for WSC, and the research community's deeper understanding of the role of surrogate tasks in assessing the intelligence of an AI system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FLIP Reasoning Challenge

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The FLIP benchmark of 11,674 blockchain image-story puzzles shows best open and closed AI models reach 75.5% and 77.9% accuracy, below the 95.3% human consensus baseline.

Pith tools