Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Vertex finding in neutrino-nucleus interaction: A Model Architecture Comparison

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.02523 v1 pith:66NPBM47 submitted 2022-01-07 hep-ex physics.data-anphysics.ins-det

classification hep-exphysics.data-anphysics.ins-det
keywords architecturesnetworkdevelopedarchitectureautomatedexpertinteractionlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We compare different neural network architectures for Machine Learning (ML) algorithms designed to identify the neutrino interaction vertex position in the MINERvA detector. The architectures developed and optimized by hand are compared with the architectures developed in an automated way using the package "Multi-node Evolutionary Neural Networks for Deep Learning" (MENNDL), developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The two architectures resulted in a similar performance which suggests that the systematics associated with the optimized network architecture are small. Furthermore, we find that while the domain expert hand-tuned network was the best performer, the differences were negligible and the auto-generated networks performed well. There is always a trade-off between human, and computer resources for network optimization and this work suggests that automated optimization, assuming resources are available, provides a compelling way to save significant expert time.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools