REVIEW 3 cited by
Compatibility and accessibility: lattice representations for semantics of non-classical and modal logics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we study three representations of lattices by means of a set with a binary relation of compatibility in the tradition of Plo\v{s}\v{c}ica. The standard representations of complete ortholattices and complete perfect Heyting algebras drop out as special cases of the first representation, while the second covers arbitrary complete lattices, as well as complete lattices equipped with a negation we call a protocomplementation. The third topological representation is a variant of that of Craig, Haviar, and Priestley. We then extend each of the three representations to lattices with a multiplicative unary modality; the representing structures, like so-called graph-based frames, add a second relation of accessibility interacting with compatibility. The three representations generalize possibility semantics for classical modal logics to non-classical modal logics, motivated by a recent application of modal orthologic to natural language semantics.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fundamental Logic Through the Lens of Modality
Three full-and-faithful translation theorems embed fundamental logic into modal versions of orthologic and intuitionistic logic, and embed intuitionistic logic into a modal extension of fundamental logic.
-
Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic
Possibility frames generalize Kripke frames and yield continuum many Kripke-incomplete modal logics that are nevertheless complete for full possibility frames, with duality theory and completeness results for all norm...
-
Vagueness and the Connectives
Sorites no-sharp-cutoff claims are satisfiable in orthologic and fundamental logic, making fundamental logic a candidate common base for epistemic-modality and vagueness phenomena.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.