RECORD
Sparsification of Decomposable Submodular Functions
Data Structures and Algorithms · Submitted 18 Jan 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our main result is a polynomial-time randomized sparsification algorithm such that the expected number of functions used in the output is independent of the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Submodular functions are at the core of many machine learning and data mining tasks. The underlying submodular functions for many of these tasks are decomposable, i.e., they are sum of several simple submodular functions. In many data intensive applications, however, the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function is so large that we need prohibitively large amount of time to process it and/or it does not even fit in the main memory. To overcome this issue, we introduce the notion of sparsification for decomposable submodular functions whose objective is to obtain an accurate approximation of the original function that is a (weighted) sum of only a few submodular functions. Our main result is a polynomial-time randomized sparsification algorithm such that the expected number of functions used in the output is independent of the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function. We also study the effectiveness of our algorithm under various constraints such as matroid and cardinality constraints. We complement our theoretical analysis with an empirical study of the performance of our algorithm.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Submodular functions are at the core of many machine learning and data mining tasks. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The underlying submodular functions for many of these tasks are decomposable, i.e., they are sum of several simple submodular functions. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | In many data intensive applications, however, the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function is so large that we need prohibitively large amount of time to process it and/or it does not even fit in the main memory. | background 0.78 | 0.09 | 0.02 | asserted 0.95 |
| s3 | To overcome this issue, we introduce the notion of sparsification for decomposable submodular functions whose objective is to obtain an accurate approximation of the original function that is a (weighted) sum of only a few submodular functions. | contribution 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.10 | asserted 0.99 |
| s4 | Our main result is a polynomial-time randomized sparsification algorithm such that the expected number of functions used in the output is independent of the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function. | result 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.97 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | We also study the effectiveness of our algorithm under various constraints such as matroid and cardinality constraints. | contribution 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.02 | asserted 0.87 |
| s6 | We complement our theoretical analysis with an empirical study of the performance of our algorithm. | contribution 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.03 | asserted 0.94 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Submodular functions are at the core of many machine learning and data mining tasks. The underlying submodular functions for many of these tasks are decomposable, i.e., they are sum of several simple submodular functions. In many data intensive applications, however, the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function is so large that we need prohibitively large amount of time to process it and/or it does not even fit in the main memory. To overcome this issue, we introduce the notion of sparsification for decomposable submodular functions whose objective is to obtain an accurate approximation of the original function that is a (weighted) sum of only a few submodular functions. Our main result is a polynomial-time randomized sparsification algorithm such that the expected number of functions used in the output is independent of the number of underlying submodular functions in the original function. We also study the effectiveness of our algorithm under various constraints such as matroid and cardinality constraints. We complement our theoretical analysis with an empirical study of the performance of our algorithm.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 9 sentences
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Contests it 1 paper
-
Firstly, we show that Inequality ([ref]) claimed in [ref] is incorrect by giving a counterexample.
Sparsification of Monotone $k$-Submodular Functions of Low Curvature · Introduction · contest 0.96
Builds on it 1 paper
-
As a starting point, we observe in Section [ref] (and prove in Appendix [ref]) that the sampling algorithm from [ref] used to prove Theorem [ref] is largely independent of submodularity, leading to a more general sparsification algorithm for decomposable functions.
Sparsification of Monotone $k$-Submodular Functions of Low Curvature · Introduction · 0.84
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
As in [ref] , it relies on sampling functions with probabilities proportional to the ratios, for each $i ∈[N]$, [equation]
Sparsification of Monotone $k$-Submodular Functions of Low Curvature · The Core Algorithm · 0.97
What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label
Cites as background 1 paper
-
This problem has been studied by [ref] and its special cases where submodular functions $f_e$ take particular forms have been studied with applications in semi-supervised learning, clustering, and rank learning (see [ref] for more details).
Hypergraph Cuts with General Splitting Functions · Submodular function minimization · 0.96
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.