Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Multi-factor Multi-level and Interaction based (M2I) Authentication Framework for Internet of Things (IoT) Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.07323 v2 pith:E7YIPMFW submitted 2022-01-18 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords authenticationlevelinteractioncostcostsframeworkprotectionprotocol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing authentication solutions proposed for Internet of Things (IoT) provide a single Level of Assurance (LoA) regardless of the sensitivity levels of the resources or interactions between IoT devices being protected. For effective (with adequate level of protection) and efficient (with as low overhead costs as possible) protections, it may be desirable to tailor the protection level in response to the sensitivity level of the resources, as a stronger protection level typically imposes a higher level of overheads costs. In this paper, we investigate how to facilitate multi-LoA authentication for IoT by proposing a multi-factor multi-level and interaction based (M2I) authentication framework. The framework implements LoA linked and interaction based authentication. Two interaction modes are investigated, P2P (Peer-to-Peer) and O2M (One-to-Many) via the design of two corresponding protocols. Evaluation results show that adopting the O2M interaction mode in authentication can cut communication cost significantly; compared with that of the Kerberos protocol, the O2M protocol reduces the communication cost by 42% ~ 45%. The protocols also introduce less computational cost. The P2P and O2M protocol, respectively, reduce the computational cost by 70% ~ 72% and 81% ~ 82% in comparison with that of Kerberos. Evaluation results also show that the two factor authentication option costs twice as much as that of the one-factor option.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools