Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Cosmic Birefringence from Planck Data Release 4

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.07682 v2 pith:K5C5O62G submitted 2022-01-19 astro-ph.CO

Cosmic Birefringence from Planck Data Release 4

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords betabirefringencecosmicdataeffectforegroundplanckrelease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We search for the signature of parity-violating physics in the cosmic microwave background, called cosmic birefringence, using the Planck data release 4. We initially find a birefringence angle of $\beta=0.30\pm0.11$ (68% C.L.) for nearly full-sky data. The values of $\beta$ decrease as we enlarge the Galactic mask, which can be interpreted as the effect of polarized foreground emission. Two independent ways to model this effect are used to mitigate the systematic impact on $\beta$ for different sky fractions. We choose not to assign cosmological significance to the measured value of $\beta$ until we improve our knowledge of the foreground polarization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CMB Birefringence from Vacuum Interfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMB polarization rotation emerges as a Pancharatnam phase localized at dark sector vacuum interfaces, independent of redshift, frequency, and the presence of light axions.

  2. First astrometric constraints on parity-violation in the gravitational wave background

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First astrometric constraints on parity-violating SGWB amplitude are reported as h70²ΩV = -0.020 ± 0.025 (Gaia) and -0.004 ± 0.010 (VLBA) at 2σ, consistent with zero, over 4.2e-18 Hz to 1.1e-8 Hz.

  3. No evidence for parity violation in BOSS

    astro-ph.CO 2024-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    New statistics applied to BOSS data show the reported parity violation signal is consistent with zero after accounting for eight-point correlation function mismatch between data and mocks.

  4. Probing Parity Violation with Weak Lensing Trispectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A parity-odd weak lensing convergence trispectrum is derived and forecast to be detectable with DES Y3/LSST Y10-like surveys under optimistic template amplitudes.

  5. Limits on global cosmic birefringence using radio sources

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    X-band radio sources yield μ_β = (0.2 ± 1.0)° for global cosmic birefringence, with stacking to ~0.6° and a forecast that ~10^5 sources could reach ~0.1° to test Planck claims.

  6. Field-level constraints on cosmic birefringence with a hybrid $E$-$B$ internal linear combination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new map-based hybrid E-B ILC estimator disentangles cosmic birefringence from miscalibration effects and measures β ≈ 0.32° ± 0.12° on Planck PR4 data.

  7. Sign-Flipping Axion Potentials via Kapitza-Type Modulation by Heavy Axions

    hep-ph 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    Coherent oscillations of a heavy axion change the sign of a light axion's effective potential, trapping it in a false vacuum and boosting its dark matter abundance.

  8. Wading the String Bog: CMB Birefringence in the Swampland

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Ultralight-axion explanations of cosmic birefringence sit in tension with Swampland bounds, while thin axionic domain walls predict exactly isotropic birefringence, so anisotropy measurements can discriminate the alte...

  9. Simultaneous inference of isotropic and anisotropic polarization rotation angles for next-generation cosmic microwave background experiments

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A Bayesian power-spectrum framework simultaneously infers isotropic and anisotropic cosmic birefringence angles, instrumental miscalibration angles, and foreground parameters from simulated multi-frequency next-genera...

  10. Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity and parity-violation through Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with next-generation ground-based interferometers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    ET+CE forecast: injected SIGW parameters (A_p, f_peak, f_NL, tau_NL, parity-odd tau_tilde_NL) are recovered within 1-2 sigma despite an astrophysical foreground, but the chiral V-mode is sub-threshold (SNR 0.5-1.9).

  11. On the potential of pseudo-scalar dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Extended analysis constrains pseudo-scalar dark energy potentials using expansion history and cosmic birefringence, finding quadratic, linear, and Ratra-Peebles forms viable near GUT scale while axion-like requires la...

  12. CMB Birefringence from Vacuum Interfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    CMB polarization rotation can arise as a frequency-independent Pancharatnam phase when photons cross dark-sector vacuum interfaces, with no ultralight axion required.

  13. BROOM: a python package for model-independent analysis of microwave astronomical data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    BROOM is a Python package that applies ILC and GILC techniques for model-independent separation of CMB, SZ, and foreground signals in microwave data along with diagnostic and simulation utilities.

  14. Cosmic Birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis of ACT DR6 CMB polarization data measures cosmic birefringence angle β = 0.215° ± 0.074° excluding zero at 2.9σ, consistent with prior WMAP and Planck results but limited by unexplained systematics.