Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.08984 v3 pith:L3NO4QSA submitted 2022-01-22 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords labellearningdisambiguationpicoalgorithmcontrastivepartialcandidate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Partial label learning (PLL) is an important problem that allows each training example to be labeled with a coarse candidate set, which well suits many real-world data annotation scenarios with label ambiguity. Despite the promise, the performance of PLL often lags behind the supervised counterpart. In this work, we bridge the gap by addressing two key research challenges in PLL -- representation learning and label disambiguation -- in one coherent framework. Specifically, our proposed framework PiCO consists of a contrastive learning module along with a novel class prototype-based label disambiguation algorithm. PiCO produces closely aligned representations for examples from the same classes and facilitates label disambiguation. Theoretically, we show that these two components are mutually beneficial, and can be rigorously justified from an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm perspective. Moreover, we study a challenging yet practical noisy partial label learning setup, where the ground-truth may not be included in the candidate set. To remedy this problem, we present an extension PiCO+ that performs distance-based clean sample selection and learns robust classifiers by a semi-supervised contrastive learning algorithm. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed methods significantly outperform the current state-of-the-art approaches in standard and noisy PLL tasks and even achieve comparable results to fully supervised learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Editing for Multimodal LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CogEdit and MIND shift multimodal knowledge editing toward evaluating and enabling meta-cognitive skills: self-awareness, boundary monitoring, and noise robustness.

  2. DeInfer: Efficient Parallel Inferencing for Decomposed Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    DVSA combines bidirectional attention, MI-based contrastive learning, and dynamic label disambiguation to improve zero-shot learning performance under ambiguous (noisy) labels.

  3. Why Can Accurate Models Be Learned from Inaccurate Annotations?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.

Pith tools