Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.09015 v1 pith:DBWOGLAJ submitted 2022-01-22 cs.SE cs.DL

classification cs.SEcs.DL
keywords softwaremetadatapublicationprojectrepositoriesresearchworkflowsautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To satisfy the principles of FAIR software, software sustainability and software citation, research software must be formally published. Publication repositories make this possible and provide published software versions with unique and persistent identifiers. However, software publication is still a tedious, mostly manual process. To streamline software publication, HERMES, a project funded by the Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration, develops automated workflows to publish research software with rich metadata. The tooling developed by the project utilizes continuous integration solutions to retrieve, collate, and process existing metadata in source repositories, and publish them on publication repositories, including checks against existing metadata requirements. To accompany the tooling and enable researchers to easily reuse it, the project also provides comprehensive documentation and templates for widely used CI solutions. In this paper, we outline the concept for these workflows, and describe how our solution advance the state of the art in research software publication.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Challenges in designing research infrastructure software in multi-stakeholder contexts

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Surveys of research software engineers and infrastructure staff show divergent priorities for automated software publication systems, with RSEs valuing infrastructure compatibility and IFs valuing usability and documentation.

Pith tools