Pith. Sign in

RECORD

US Velocimetry in Participants with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Medical Physics · Submitted 7 Feb 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2202.03014 (version 1)
Pith IDHGWGT6CD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationErik Groot Jebbink, Guillaume PR Lajoinie, Jason Voorneveld, Johan G Bosch, Majorie van Helvert, Michel MPJ Reijnen, Michel Versluis, Stefan Engelhard. "US Velocimetry in Participants with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease." arXiv:2202.03014 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/HGWGT6CD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 10,131 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.97 · human participants 0.99 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments. Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results: 35 participants were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole, shadow regions, a short vessel segment in the image plane, and loss of contrast during diastole. In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole, whereas the vector correlation was lower. Flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. contribution 0.95 0.35 0.02 unclear 0.83
s2 In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments. method 0.92 0.96 0.02 asserted 0.97
s3 Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. method 1.00 0.93 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. method 1.00 0.93 0.01 asserted 0.80
s5 The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. method 1.00 0.94 0.01 asserted 0.88
s6 In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. method 0.97 0.96 0.01 asserted 0.95
s7 Results: 35 participants were included. result 0.88 0.92 0.01 asserted 0.99
s8 Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. result 1.00 0.96 0.04 asserted 1.00
s9 In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole, shadow regions, a short vessel segment in the image plane, and loss of contrast during diastole. result 0.90 0.95 0.02 asserted 1.00
s10 In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. result 1.00 0.94 0.04 asserted 1.00
s11 The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole, whereas the vector correlation was lower. result 1.00 0.95 0.03 asserted 1.00
s12 Flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. result 1.00 0.95 0.03 asserted 1.00
s13 Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice. interpretation 0.96 0.85 0.97 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.88 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments. Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results: 35 participants were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole, shadow regions, a short vessel segment in the image plane, and loss of contrast during diastole. In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole, whereas the vector correlation was lower. Flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.