Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

QUARK: A Framework for Quantum Computing Application Benchmarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.03028 v3 pith:57D5T577 submitted 2022-02-07 quant-ph cs.ET

classification quant-phcs.ET
keywords quantumbenchmarkscomputingdifferentapplicationbenchmarkframeworkproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum computing (QC) is anticipated to provide a speedup over classical HPC approaches for specific problems in optimization, simulation, and machine learning. With the advances in quantum computing toward practical applications, the need to analyze and compare different quantum solutions increases. While different low-level benchmarks for QC exist, these benchmarks do not provide sufficient insights into real-world application-level performance. We propose an application-centric benchmark method and the QUantum computing Application benchmaRK (QUARK) framework to foster the investigation and creation of application benchmarks for QC. This paper establishes three significant contributions: (1) it makes a case for application-level benchmarks and provides an in-depth "pen and paper" benchmark formulation of two reference problems: robot path and vehicle option optimization from the industrial domain; (2) it proposes the open-source QUARK framework for designing, implementing, executing, and analyzing benchmarks; (3) it provides multiple reference implementations for these two reference problems based on different known, and where needed, extended, classical and quantum algorithmic approaches and analyzes their performance on different types of infrastructures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Featuremetric benchmarking: Quantum computer benchmarks based on circuit features

    quant-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmarking framework that maps quantum computer error rates against arbitrary circuit features and uses Gaussian process regression to build predictive performance models from sparse data.

  2. Quantum Fidelity-per-Cost: A Metric for Evaluation of Quantum Computing Systems

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Cost-aware ranking of cloud QPUs via QFC disagrees with fidelity-only ranking; billing model, not hardware, fixes how the score scales with shot count.

  3. Solving graph problems using permutation-invariant quantum machine learning

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Permutation-invariant quantum circuits vastly outperform generic quantum machine learning ansatzes on 8-qubit graph classification tasks in simulation.

Pith tools