Pith. Sign in

RECORD

FrAUG: A Frame Rate Based Data Augmentation Method for Depression Detection from Speech Signals

Audio and Speech Processing · Submitted 11 Feb 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Further, the proposed method outperformed commonly used data-augmentation methods such as noise augmentation, VTLP, Speed, and Pitch Perturbation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2202.05912 (version 1)
Pith IDDTV3SER2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAbeer Alwan, Jinhan Wang, Jonathan Flint, Vijay Ravi. "FrAUG: A Frame Rate Based Data Augmentation Method for Depression Detection from Speech Signals." arXiv:2202.05912 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/DTV3SER2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,880 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.74 · controlled comparison 0.97 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper, a data augmentation method is proposed for depression detection from speech signals. Samples for data augmentation were created by changing the frame-width and the frame-shift parameters during the feature extraction process. Unlike other data augmentation methods (such as VTLP, pitch perturbation, or speed perturbation), the proposed method does not explicitly change acoustic parameters but rather the time-frequency resolution of frame-level features. The proposed method was evaluated using two different datasets, models, and input acoustic features. For the DAIC-WOZ (English) dataset when using the DepAudioNet model and mel-Spectrograms as input, the proposed method resulted in an improvement of 5.97% (validation) and 25.13% (test) when compared to the baseline. The improvements for the CONVERGE (Mandarin) dataset when using the x-vector embeddings with CNN as the backend and MFCCs as input features were 9.32% (validation) and 12.99% (test). Baseline systems do not incorporate any data augmentation. Further, the proposed method outperformed commonly used data-augmentation methods such as noise augmentation, VTLP, Speed, and Pitch Perturbation. All improvements were statistically significant.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper, a data augmentation method is proposed for depression detection from speech signals. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.06 asserted 0.99
s1 Samples for data augmentation were created by changing the frame-width and the frame-shift parameters during the feature extraction process. method 1.00 0.94 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Unlike other data augmentation methods (such as VTLP, pitch perturbation, or speed perturbation), the proposed method does not explicitly change acoustic parameters but rather the time-frequency resolution of frame-level features. contribution 0.55 0.42 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 The proposed method was evaluated using two different datasets, models, and input acoustic features. method 0.91 0.93 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 For the DAIC-WOZ (English) dataset when using the DepAudioNet model and mel-Spectrograms as input, the proposed method resulted in an improvement of 5.97% (validation) and 25.13% (test) when compared to the baseline. result 1.00 0.97 0.19 asserted 1.00
s5 The improvements for the CONVERGE (Mandarin) dataset when using the x-vector embeddings with CNN as the backend and MFCCs as input features were 9.32% (validation) and 12.99% (test). result 1.00 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 Baseline systems do not incorporate any data augmentation. background 0.45 0.34 0.03 asserted 1.00
s7 Further, the proposed method outperformed commonly used data-augmentation methods such as noise augmentation, VTLP, Speed, and Pitch Perturbation. result 1.00 0.88 0.31 asserted 1.00
s8 All improvements were statistically significant. result 0.85 0.91 0.15 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.85.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper, a data augmentation method is proposed for depression detection from speech signals. Samples for data augmentation were created by changing the frame-width and the frame-shift parameters during the feature extraction process. Unlike other data augmentation methods (such as VTLP, pitch perturbation, or speed perturbation), the proposed method does not explicitly change acoustic parameters but rather the time-frequency resolution of frame-level features. The proposed method was evaluated using two different datasets, models, and input acoustic features. For the DAIC-WOZ (English) dataset when using the DepAudioNet model and mel-Spectrograms as input, the proposed method resulted in an improvement of 5.97% (validation) and 25.13% (test) when compared to the baseline. The improvements for the CONVERGE (Mandarin) dataset when using the x-vector embeddings with CNN as the backend and MFCCs as input features were 9.32% (validation) and 12.99% (test). Baseline systems do not incorporate any data augmentation. Further, the proposed method outperformed commonly used data-augmentation methods such as noise augmentation, VTLP, Speed, and Pitch Perturbation. All improvements were statistically significant.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • The MUSAN library [ref] was used to augment every utterance with randomly chosen foreground noise samples at a randomly chosen SNR of 0,5,10, or 15 dB [ref] .

    MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpus · FrAUG versus Conventional Data Augmentation Methods · 0.93

Compares with 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.