Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improved Finite-Key Security Analysis of Quantum Key Distribution Against Trojan-Horse Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.06630 v1 pith:NHKBPZIG submitted 2022-02-14 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords securityattacksdevicesdistributionfinite-keyinformationlightquantum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most security proofs of quantum key distribution (QKD) disregard the effect of information leakage from the users' devices, and, thus, do not protect against Trojan-horse attacks (THAs). In a THA, the eavesdropper injects strong light into the QKD apparatuses, and then analyzes the back-reflected light to learn information about their internal setting choices. Only a few recent works consider this security threat, but predict a rather poor performance of QKD unless the devices are strongly isolated from the channel. Here, we derive finite-key security bounds for decoy-state-based QKD schemes in the presence of THAs, which significantly outperform previous analyses. Our results constitute an important step forward to closing the existing gap between theory and practice in QKD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Security proofs for practical QKD: variations, techniques, gaps, and limitations

    quant-ph 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical review of decoy-state BB84 security proofs identifies common gaps and shows that no current proof meets the full standard of completeness, modularity, and verifiability.

Pith tools