REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The evaluation of explanation methods is a research topic that has not yet been explored deeply, however, since explainability is supposed to strengthen trust in artificial intelligence, it is necessary to systematically review and compare explanation methods in order to confirm their correctness. Until now, no tool with focus on XAI evaluation exists that exhaustively and speedily allows researchers to evaluate the performance of explanations of neural network predictions. To increase transparency and reproducibility in the field, we therefore built Quantus -- a comprehensive, evaluation toolkit in Python that includes a growing, well-organised collection of evaluation metrics and tutorials for evaluating explainable methods. The toolkit has been thoroughly tested and is available under an open-source license on PyPi (or on https://github.com/understandable-machine-intelligence-lab/Quantus/).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Perspectives for Direct Interpretability in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
A perspective paper that advocates direct, post hoc interpretability for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning and offers a taxonomy of where those methods might apply.
-
xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods
A technical report introducing xai_evals, a Python package that wraps existing explainability and metric libraries without adding new methods or validated results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.