RECORD
Photometric Redshifts for Cosmology: Improving Accuracy and Uncertainty Estimates Using Bayesian Neural Networks
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 15 Feb 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We find that while the Bayesian neural network did not perform as well as non-Bayesian neural networks if evaluated solely by point estimate photo-z values, BNNs can provide uncertainty estimates that are necessary for cosmology
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present results exploring the role that probabilistic deep learning models can play in cosmology from large scale astronomical surveys through estimating the distances to galaxies (redshifts) from photometry. Due to the massive scale of data coming from these new and upcoming sky surveys, machine learning techniques using galaxy photometry are increasingly adopted to predict galactic redshifts which are important for inferring cosmological parameters such as the nature of dark energy. Associated uncertainty estimates are also critical measurements, however, common machine learning methods typically provide only point estimates and lack uncertainty information as outputs. We turn to Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) as a promising way to provide accurate predictions of redshift values. We have compiled a new galaxy training dataset from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey, designed to mimic large surveys, but over a smaller portion of the sky. We evaluate the performance and accuracy of photometric redshift (photo-z) predictions from photometry using machine learning, astronomical and probabilistic metrics. We find that while the Bayesian neural network did not perform as well as non-Bayesian neural networks if evaluated solely by point estimate photo-z values, BNNs can provide uncertainty estimates that are necessary for cosmology
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present results exploring the role that probabilistic deep learning models can play in cosmology from large scale astronomical surveys through estimating the distances to galaxies (redshifts) from photometry. | contribution 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.06 | asserted 0.77 |
| s1 | Due to the massive scale of data coming from these new and upcoming sky surveys, machine learning techniques using galaxy photometry are increasingly adopted to predict galactic redshifts which are important for inferring cosmological parameters such as the nature of dark energy. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | Associated uncertainty estimates are also critical measurements, however, common machine learning methods typically provide only point estimates and lack uncertainty information as outputs. | gap 0.89 | 0.08 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We turn to Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) as a promising way to provide accurate predictions of redshift values. | method 0.79 | 0.41 | 0.07 | hedged possibility 0.82 |
| s4 | We have compiled a new galaxy training dataset from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey, designed to mimic large surveys, but over a smaller portion of the sky. | method 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | We evaluate the performance and accuracy of photometric redshift (photo-z) predictions from photometry using machine learning, astronomical and probabilistic metrics. | method 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.03 | asserted 0.83 |
| s6 | We find that while the Bayesian neural network did not perform as well as non-Bayesian neural networks if evaluated solely by point estimate photo-z values, BNNs can provide uncertainty estimates that are necessary for cosmology | result 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.85 | asserted 0.97 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present results exploring the role that probabilistic deep learning models can play in cosmology from large scale astronomical surveys through estimating the distances to galaxies (redshifts) from photometry. Due to the massive scale of data coming from these new and upcoming sky surveys, machine learning techniques using galaxy photometry are increasingly adopted to predict galactic redshifts which are important for inferring cosmological parameters such as the nature of dark energy. Associated uncertainty estimates are also critical measurements, however, common machine learning methods typically provide only point estimates and lack uncertainty information as outputs. We turn to Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) as a promising way to provide accurate predictions of redshift values. We have compiled a new galaxy training dataset from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey, designed to mimic large surveys, but over a smaller portion of the sky. We evaluate the performance and accuracy of photometric redshift (photo-z) predictions from photometry using machine learning, astronomical and probabilistic metrics. We find that while the Bayesian neural network did not perform as well as non-Bayesian neural networks if evaluated solely by point estimate photo-z values, BNNs can provide uncertainty estimates that are necessary for cosmology
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
5 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences
Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
-
We employed a neural network (NN) architecture based on [ref] for photometric redshift estimation, consisting of four fully connected layers with ReLU activation and a skip connection.
Using different sources of ground truths and transfer learning to improve the generalization of photometric redshift estimation · Methodology & metrics · 1.00
-
And we define a similar metric called coverage introduced in [ref] to examine our reliability of uncertainties: [equation] where $N_gal$ is the number of galaxy samples in specific redshift bin, and $σ$ is the 68% confidence interval of prediction for every sample.
Photometric redshift estimates using Bayesian neural networks in the CSST survey · Results and Discussions · 0.92
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Photo-$z$ estimation techniques fall into two categories: template-fitting [ref] , which matches photometry to spectroscopic or physical model templates, and machine learning [ref] , which trains supervised models to map photometry to reference redshifts.
Zephyr : Stitching Heterogeneous Training Data with Normalizing Flows for Photometric Redshift Inference · Introduction · 0.92
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
We use data quality cuts similar to [ref] and [ref] (see [<https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5528827>] for full list).
Photometric Redshifts for the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Data Release 2 · Data: Galaxy observations · 0.94
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
We crossmatched galaxy photometry from HSC with the HSC collection of publicly available spectroscopic redshifts [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] using the galaxies' sky positions (d < 1 arcsecond).
Science Objectives and Early Results of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey · Data: Galaxy observations · 0.99
Compares with 1 paper
-
While our goal in this work is to compare the two types of NNs, we provide a comparison to LSST requirements [ref] (Table 2) for reference.
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements Document · Results · 0.94
Cites as background 1 paper
-
In this work, we investigate photometric redshift (photo-z) estimation using Bayesian neural networks (BNN), a type of probabilistic neural network (NN) [ref] .
Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Users · Introduction · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.