Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Identifying Social Bias in Dialog Systems: Frame, Datasets, and Benchmarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.08011 v2 pith:EKOWZMLZ submitted 2022-02-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords biasdialogsocialsystemsbenchmarksdetectionframeanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The research of open-domain dialog systems has been greatly prospered by neural models trained on large-scale corpora, however, such corpora often introduce various safety problems (e.g., offensive languages, biases, and toxic behaviors) that significantly hinder the deployment of dialog systems in practice. Among all these unsafe issues, addressing social bias is more complex as its negative impact on marginalized populations is usually expressed implicitly, thus requiring normative reasoning and rigorous analysis. In this paper, we focus our investigation on social bias detection of dialog safety problems. We first propose a novel Dial-Bias Frame for analyzing the social bias in conversations pragmatically, which considers more comprehensive bias-related analyses rather than simple dichotomy annotations. Based on the proposed framework, we further introduce CDail-Bias Dataset that, to our knowledge, is the first well-annotated Chinese social bias dialog dataset. In addition, we establish several dialog bias detection benchmarks at different label granularities and input types (utterance-level and context-level). We show that the proposed in-depth analyses together with these benchmarks in our Dial-Bias Frame are necessary and essential to bias detection tasks and can benefit building safe dialog systems in practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chinese Toxic Language Mitigation via Sentiment Polarity Consistent Rewrites

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new Chinese detoxification dataset and 17-model benchmark show that LLMs can remove toxic words but often distort emotional tone, especially for emoji, homophone, and dialogue-based toxicity.

Pith tools