Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Frame-related Sequences in Chains and Scales of Hilbert Spaces

Functional Analysis · Submitted 17 Feb 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This leads to a negative result: a sequence can never be a frame for two Hilbert spaces of the scale if the scale is non-trivial, i.e. spaces are not equal.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2202.08749 (version 1)
Pith ID235V5SW7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGiorgia Bellomonte, Hessam Hosseinnezhad, Peter Balazs. "Frame-related Sequences in Chains and Scales of Hilbert Spaces." arXiv:2202.08749 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/235V5SW7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,178 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.85 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Frames for Hilbert spaces are interesting for mathematicians but also important for applications e.g. in signal analysis and in physics. Both in mathematics and physics it is natural to consider a full scale of spaces, and not only a single one. In this paper, we study how certain frame-related properties, as completeness or the property of being a (semi-)frame, of a certain sequence in one of the spaces propagate to other spaces in a scale. We link that to the properties of the respective frame-related operators, like analysis or synthesis. We start with a detailed survey of the theory of Hilbert chains. Using a canonical isomorphism the properties of frame sequences are naturally preserved between different spaces. We also show that some results can be transferred if the original sequence is considered, in particular that the upper semi-frame property is kept in larger spaces, while the lower one to smaller ones. This leads to a negative result: a sequence can never be a frame for two Hilbert spaces of the scale if the scale is non-trivial, i.e. spaces are not equal.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Frames for Hilbert spaces are interesting for mathematicians but also important for applications e.g. in signal analysis and in physics. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Both in mathematics and physics it is natural to consider a full scale of spaces, and not only a single one. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.97
s2 In this paper, we study how certain frame-related properties, as completeness or the property of being a (semi-)frame, of a certain sequence in one of the spaces propagate to other spaces in a scale. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.86
s3 We link that to the properties of the respective frame-related operators, like analysis or synthesis. contribution 0.69 0.82 0.03 asserted 0.97
s4 We start with a detailed survey of the theory of Hilbert chains. method 0.43 0.52 0.02 asserted 0.86
s5 Using a canonical isomorphism the properties of frame sequences are naturally preserved between different spaces. result 0.87 0.55 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 We also show that some results can be transferred if the original sequence is considered, in particular that the upper semi-frame property is kept in larger spaces, while the lower one to smaller ones. result 0.97 0.94 0.13 asserted 0.89
s7 This leads to a negative result: a sequence can never be a frame for two Hilbert spaces of the scale if the scale is non-trivial, i.e. spaces are not equal. result 0.98 0.90 0.71 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Frames for Hilbert spaces are interesting for mathematicians but also important for applications e.g. in signal analysis and in physics. Both in mathematics and physics it is natural to consider a full scale of spaces, and not only a single one. In this paper, we study how certain frame-related properties, as completeness or the property of being a (semi-)frame, of a certain sequence in one of the spaces propagate to other spaces in a scale. We link that to the properties of the respective frame-related operators, like analysis or synthesis. We start with a detailed survey of the theory of Hilbert chains. Using a canonical isomorphism the properties of frame sequences are naturally preserved between different spaces. We also show that some results can be transferred if the original sequence is considered, in particular that the upper semi-frame property is kept in larger spaces, while the lower one to smaller ones. This leads to a negative result: a sequence can never be a frame for two Hilbert spaces of the scale if the scale is non-trivial, i.e. spaces are not equal.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.