Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adaptive Experimentation in the Presence of Exogenous Nonstationary Variation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.09036 v4 pith:N3AAW33U submitted 2022-02-18 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords exogenoustreatmentvariationalgorithmarmsdeconfoundednonstationaryobserved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate experiments that are designed to select a treatment arm for population deployment. Multi-armed bandit algorithms can enhance efficiency by dynamically allocating measurement effort towards higher performing arms based on observed feedback. However, such dynamics can result in brittle behavior in the face of nonstationary exogenous factors influencing arms' performance during the experiment. To counter this, we propose deconfounded Thompson sampling (DTS), a more robust variant of the prominent Thompson sampling algorithm. As observations accumulate, DTS projects the population-level performance of an arm while controlling for the context within which observed treatment decisions were made. Contexts here might capture a comprehensible source of variation, such as the country of a treated individual, or simply record the time of treatment. We provide bounds on both within-experiment and post-experiment regret of DTS, illustrating its resilience to exogenous variation and the delicate balance it strikes between exploration and exploitation. Our proofs leverage inverse propensity weights to analyze the evolution of the posterior distribution, a departure from established methods in the literature. Hinting that new understanding is indeed necessary, we show that a deconfounded variant of the popular upper confidence bound algorithm can fail completely.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Admissibility of Completely Randomized Trials: A Large-Deviation Approach

    stat.ML 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Batched arm elimination designs with a sufficiently large first batch achieve a strictly higher large-deviation efficiency exponent than completely randomized trials for every Gaussian instance with K at least 3.

Pith tools