Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DialFRED: Dialogue-Enabled Agents for Embodied Instruction Following

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13330 v2 pith:7SQPVNNR submitted 2022-02-27 cs.AI cs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.RO
keywords agentdialfredembodiedquestionsuseragentsbenchmarkcommand
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language-guided Embodied AI benchmarks requiring an agent to navigate an environment and manipulate objects typically allow one-way communication: the human user gives a natural language command to the agent, and the agent can only follow the command passively. We present DialFRED, a dialogue-enabled embodied instruction following benchmark based on the ALFRED benchmark. DialFRED allows an agent to actively ask questions to the human user; the additional information in the user's response is used by the agent to better complete its task. We release a human-annotated dataset with 53K task-relevant questions and answers and an oracle to answer questions. To solve DialFRED, we propose a questioner-performer framework wherein the questioner is pre-trained with the human-annotated data and fine-tuned with reinforcement learning. We make DialFRED publicly available and encourage researchers to propose and evaluate their solutions to building dialog-enabled embodied agents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conditional Multi-Stage Failure Recovery for Embodied Agents

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A conditional four-stage chain-prompting method for failure recovery improves success on the TEACH embodied-agent benchmark from 24.9% to 36.5% with the same plan and executor.

Pith tools