Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

KMIR: A Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Memorization, Identification and Reasoning Abilities of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13529 v1 pith:OFG5KAZZ submitted 2022-02-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgeplmskmiridentificationmemorizationreasoningabilitiesfacts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous works show the great potential of pre-trained language models (PLMs) for storing a large amount of factual knowledge. However, to figure out whether PLMs can be reliable knowledge sources and used as alternative knowledge bases (KBs), we need to further explore some critical features of PLMs. Firstly, knowledge memorization and identification abilities: traditional KBs can store various types of entities and relationships; do PLMs have a high knowledge capacity to store different types of knowledge? Secondly, reasoning ability: a qualified knowledge source should not only provide a collection of facts, but support a symbolic reasoner. Can PLMs derive new knowledge based on the correlations between facts? To evaluate these features of PLMs, we propose a benchmark, named Knowledge Memorization, Identification, and Reasoning test (KMIR). KMIR covers 3 types of knowledge, including general knowledge, domain-specific knowledge, and commonsense, and provides 184,348 well-designed questions. Preliminary experiments with various representative pre-training language models on KMIR reveal many interesting phenomenons: 1) The memorization ability of PLMs depends more on the number of parameters than training schemes. 2) Current PLMs are struggling to robustly remember the facts. 3) Model compression technology retains the amount of knowledge well, but hurts the identification and reasoning abilities. We hope KMIR can facilitate the design of PLMs as better knowledge sources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Language Model-Driven Question Answering

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    On memorized question-answer pairs from KMIR and NQ, bottleneck and prefix adapters trained on entity-swapped contexts let a GPT-2 reader follow the new context most of the time, though no baselines are reported.

Pith tools