REVIEW 2 cited by
Is quantum advantage the right goal for quantum machine learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning is frequently listed among the most promising applications for quantum computing. This is in fact a curious choice: Today's machine learning algorithms are notoriously powerful in practice, but remain theoretically difficult to study. Quantum computing, in contrast, does not offer practical benchmarks on realistic scales, and theory is the main tool we have to judge whether it could become relevant for a problem. In this perspective we explain why it is so difficult to say something about the practical power of quantum computers for machine learning with the tools we are currently using. We argue that these challenges call for a critical debate on whether quantum advantage and the narrative of 'beating' classical machine learning should continue to dominate the literature the way it does, and highlight examples for how other perspectives in existing research provide an important alternative to the focus on advantage.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Fourier Wall: Why Public Tabular Datasets Refuse Quantum Advantage, and a Certified Recipe for Where It Lives
Quantum models beat tuned classical baselines on tabular data only when the target spectrum is off-grid, high-order, high-frequency, near-independent, and dense; SPECTRA certifies these conditions and refuses most pub...
-
Perspectives on Utilization of Measurements in Quantum Algorithms
A survey that categorizes quantum measurement uses into static circuits, dynamic circuits, and challenge-solving techniques, and argues measurements deserve more attention in algorithm design.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.