REVIEW 1 cited by
foREST: A Tree-based Approach for Fuzzing RESTful APIs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Representational state transfer (REST) is a widely employed architecture by web applications and cloud. Users can invoke such services according to the specification of their application interfaces, namely RESTful APIs. Existing approaches for fuzzing RESTful APIs are generally based on classic API-dependency graphs. However, such dependencies are inefficient for REST services due to the explosion of dependencies among APIs. In this paper, we propose a novel tree-based approach that can better capture the essential dependencies and largely improve the efficiency of RESTful API fuzzing. In particular, the hierarchical information of the endpoints across multiple APIs enables us to construct an API tree, and the relationships of tree nodes can indicate the priority of resource dependencies, \textit{e.g.,} it's more likely that a node depends on its parent node rather than its offspring or siblings. In the evaluation part, we first confirm that such a tree-based approach is more efficient than traditional graph-based approaches. We then apply our tool to fuzz two real-world RESTful services and compare the performance with two state-of-the-art tools, EvoMaster and RESTler. Our results show that foREST can improve the code coverage in all experiments, ranging from 11.5\% to 82.5\%. Besides, our tool finds 11 new bugs previously unknown.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Automating a Complete Software Test Process Using LLMs: An Automotive Case Study
An LLM-driven pipeline (SPAPI-Tester) automated the entire vehicle API test process, achieving 93-98% API pass rates, at least 0.97 precision, up to 0.85 recall, and 100% detection of 38 expert-labeled buggy APIs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.