Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Is the dark energy equation of state parameter singular?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.04167 v2 pith:3G74JUM5 submitted 2022-03-08 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords energyequationdarkdensityparameterstatepoledirectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A dark energy with a negative energy density in the past can simultaneously address various cosmological tensions, and if it is to be positive today to drive the observed acceleration of the universe, we show that it should have a pole in its equation of state parameter. More precisely, in a spatially uniform universe, a perfect fluid (submitting to the usual continuity equation of local energy conservation) whose energy density $\rho(z)$ vanishes at an isolated zero $z=z_p$, necessarily has a pole in its equation of state parameter $w(z)$ at $z_p$, and, $w(z)$ diverges to positive infinity in the limit $z\to z_p^+$ and it diverges to negative infinity in the limit $z\to z_p^-$ -- we assume that $z_p$ is not an accumulation point for poles of $w(z)$. However, the converse statement that this kind of a pole of $w(z)$ corresponds to a vanishing energy density at that point is not true as we show by a counterexample. An immediate implication of this result is that one should be hesitant to observationally reconstruct the equation of state parameter of the dark energy directly, and rather infer it from a directly reconstructed dark energy density.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defocusing dark energy: Raychaudhuri diagnostics beyond $w<-1/3$ and the phantom divide

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For sign-changing effective dark energy, smooth negative-to-positive density crossings make ρ+3p and ρ+p the correct diagnostics, give w=p/ρ a universal pole n(1+z†)/3, and force repulsion onset z_rep>z† while ρ<0.

  2. Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Smooth ECDM dark energy remains compatible with Planck+ACT+SPT, DESI DR2 and Pantheon+/SH0ES while alleviating the Hubble tension through a controlled late-time density transition.

  3. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

  4. Background-level reconstruction of scalar-field potentials from dark-energy histories and comparison with analytic potential families

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A background reconstruction maps prescribed ρ_de(z) histories to V(φ) and ranks analytic potentials by Bayesian evidence, with exponential preferred for CPL and shifted-tanh for sign-switching targets.

Pith tools