Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 197 references

Smooth sign-switching dark energy fits full CMB, DESI and Pantheon+ data while easing the Hubble tension.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 09:39 UTC pith:DQDH5TEH

load-bearing objection Solid first full-perturbation constraints on smooth sign-switching DE; the H0 relief and statistical preference are real but sit on a fluid-model upper bound for transition speed that the authors themselves flag. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05044 v1 pith:DQDH5TEH submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords sign-switching dark energyECDMHubble tensioncosmological perturbationsCMBDESI BAOPantheon+ISW effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a smooth version of sign-switching dark energy, called ECDM, in which the dark-energy density gradually rises from a negative value to a positive one. The authors rewrite the linear-perturbation equations so they stay finite even when the dark-energy equation of state diverges at the zero-crossing. They then fit the model to Planck, ACT and SPT CMB data, DESI BAO, Pantheon+ supernovae and the SH0ES Hubble-constant measurement. The joint analysis shows that ECDM remains compatible with all these probes, prefers a finite transition speed rather than an instantaneous jump, and moves the inferred Hubble constant closer to the local value, thereby reducing the long-standing tension with early-universe inferences.

Core claim

When linear dark-energy perturbations are treated consistently, the smooth error-function ECDM model is fully compatible with current precision CMB, BAO and supernova data and simultaneously lowers the Hubble tension relative to flat ΛCDM.

What carries the argument

The rescaled density contrast f_A = δ ho_A / (ρ_A + p_A), which remains finite when the dark-energy density crosses zero and thereby allows stable numerical evolution of perturbations through the sign switch.

Load-bearing premise

The rest-frame sound speed of dark energy is fixed by hand to the speed of light, and the background density is assumed to follow a pure two-parameter error-function profile.

What would settle it

A decisive increase in the best-fit χ^{2} when the transition speed is forced to extreme values, or a statistically significant mismatch between the predicted fσ_8(z) or CMB-lensing spectrum and forthcoming redshift-space-distortion or lensing data.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Joint CMB+BAO+SNe analyses will continue to favour a finite transition speed over an instantaneous AdS-to-dS jump.
  • The model predicts a temporary negative ISW–galaxy cross-correlation around the transition redshift that future surveys can search for.
  • Ultra-fast transitions are ruled out by the growth of structure once dark-energy perturbations are included.
  • Early-universe physics remains essentially unchanged, so the sound-horizon scale is left intact.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A microphysical scalar-field realisation would be needed to decide whether the upper bound on transition speed is generic or an artefact of the error-function ansatz.
  • The same regularisation of perturbations could be applied to other models that cross the null-energy condition or the zero-density line.
  • If the mild S_8 upshift survives, weak-lensing surveys may become the decisive arbiter between ECDM and ΛCDM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a consistent linear-perturbation formulation for the ECDM model (error-function sign-switching dark energy density, Eq. 3.1) that remains regular when w_d diverges at the zero-crossing of ρ_d. Using a modified CAMB + Cobaya MCMC pipeline, the authors confront the model with Planck 2018 + ACT DR6 + SPT-3G CMB (including lensing), DESI DR2 BAO, Pantheon+ SNe, and SH0ES H0. They report that ECDM is compatible with the full data suite, yields a mild upward shift in H0 relative to ΛCDM (Table 2), improves most information criteria and tension metrics when SH0ES is included, and produces distinctive but observationally acceptable signatures in the matter power spectrum, ISW, and CMB lensing (Figs. 9–11).

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies the first full-CMB, perturbation-consistent test of a smooth sign-switching DE scenario, closing a technical gap left by earlier background-only or abrupt-transition (ΛsCDM) studies. The regularised variables f_A ≡ δ_A/(1+w_A) (Eqs. 4.4–4.5) and the accompanying synchronous-gauge implementation are reusable for any DE model that crosses ρ=0 or w=−1. The multi-probe power-spectrum analysis and the extensive suite of AIC/BIC/DIC/WAIC/evidence/suspiciousness diagnostics further strengthen the empirical case that late-time sign-switching remains viable. These elements constitute a clear incremental advance for the sign-switching literature and for the broader CosmoVerse programme.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.1–6.2, Table 2, Figs. 1 & 8] §6.1–6.2 and Table 2: every data combination returns only an upper bound on log10 η (or η). The text itself states that this bound is “data-independent” and “originates from the breakdown of the dark-energy fluid description” (oscillatory f_d after the transition, lower-centre panel of Fig. 1 and the fixed-η=10^{3/2} experiment of Fig. 8). When the largest prior value is forced, H0 rises toward the SH0ES value but S8 jumps to ~0.90 and χ² degrades by ~10 %. Thus the region that most effectively alleviates the Hubble tension is precisely the region excluded by the regularised fluid equations. The central claim of “full compatibility while alleviating the Hubble tension” therefore rests on a prior-truncated, model-breakdown bound that must be either (i) shown to be physical rather than an artefact of the perfect-fluid closure, or (ii) replaced by a more fundamental (e.g. scalar-field) real
  2. [§4.1] §4.1: the rest-frame sound speed is fixed by hand to c_s^{2}=1 “for simplicity,” with only a brief check that small positive values leave the spectra unchanged. Because c_s^{2} directly controls the DE clustering that sources the ISW and the late-time growth features used to disfavour rapid transitions, the statistical preference for ECDM (and the upper bound on η) could shift under a free or scale-dependent c_s^{2}. A short MCMC exploration of c_s^{2} (or at least a clear demonstration that the posterior on {η,z†,H0} is insensitive) is required for the load-bearing claims of §§6–8.
  3. [§6.1, Fig. 2, Table 2] CMB-only posteriors are bimodal (Fig. 2), with a slow-transition branch that yields H0≳80 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} but is later eliminated by SNe. The paper reports the combined-data H0≃69 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} as “alleviating” the tension, yet the quantitative reduction relative to ΛCDM is modest (~0.8 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}) once the slow branch is removed. A clearer statement of the residual tension (in σ) for the fast branch alone, both with and without SH0ES, would prevent over-statement of the model’s success.
minor comments (5)
  1. [title, abstract] Title and abstract contain typographical artefacts (“Hubble T ension”, “PantheonPlus”). Standardise to “Hubble Tension” and “Pantheon+” throughout.
  2. [§3] Eq. (3.2) and the subsequent total-w expression (3.3) would benefit from an explicit statement that the apparent pole in w_d is integrable and does not affect the background expansion; a short analytic check would help non-specialist readers.
  3. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 caption refers to “MAP values form the CMB-SPA combination”; correct the typo and define “SPA” (or replace by the explicit data combination used).
  4. [Table 1] The prior table (Table 1) lists both log10(log10(1+z†)) and the linear z†; clarify which parametrisation is actually sampled and which is derived.
  5. [Appendix C] Appendix C defines several Bayesian estimators but does not state the precise value of α used for the truncated harmonic-mean evidence; the text later adopts α=0.95—move that choice into the appendix for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: phenomenological ECDM ansatz is adopted via self-citation, but the regularised perturbation equations and all data constraints are independently derived and fitted to external observations.

specific steps
  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [§3, Eq. (3.1) and surrounding text]
    "we adopt the ECDM model introduced in [167, 168, 182], in which the DE density is described by an error-function profile that allows for a continuous interpolation between an early-time negative density and a late-time positive de Sitter-like phase."

    The functional form ρ_d(x) ∝ erf(η(x−x†)) is not derived; it is imported by citation to the authors' own prior phenomenological papers. The present work then treats that form as the model under test. This is a mild ansatz-via-self-citation, but it is not load-bearing for the new results (perturbation reformulation or data constraints).

full rationale

The paper's central technical contribution (regularised linear DE perturbations that remain finite when w_d diverges) is obtained by a direct algebraic substitution f_A ≡ δ_A/(1+w_A) into the standard continuity and Euler equations; the resulting system (4.5) is well-defined by construction and does not presuppose any observational outcome. The background density profile itself is an explicit two-parameter ansatz (error-function interpolation) taken from the authors' earlier background-only papers; this is ordinary model-building, not a uniqueness theorem or a fitted quantity re-labelled as a prediction. All subsequent claims—compatibility with Planck+ACT+SPT+DESI+Pantheon+/SH0ES, mild H_0 relief, upper bounds on transition speed η—are ordinary MCMC posteriors against external data sets. The data-independent upper bound on η arises from the fluid description itself (oscillatory f_d after the sign switch) and is openly reported as a limitation, not hidden as a success. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by algebra or by an unverified self-citation chain. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation of the ansatz.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological two-parameter extension of ΛCDM plus the perfect-fluid approximation with fixed sound speed. Standard cosmological parameters and data sets are taken from the literature; the only new free parameters and the regularised fluid variables are introduced by the paper itself.

free parameters (3)
  • log10 η (transition rapidity) = 0.67^{+0.56}_{-0.50} (CMB+PPS+DESI)
    Controls the width of the error-function density flip; fitted freely (flat prior) and drives the preferred intermediate-speed branch.
  • log10(log10(1+z†)) (transition redshift) = –0.229^{+0.022}_{-0.040} (CMB+PPS+DESI)
    Sets the epoch of the sign change; free parameter that shifts H0 and growth history.
  • standard ΛCDM six-parameter set {Ω_b h², Ω_c h², H0, ln(10^{10} A_s), n_s, τ_reio}
    Baseline early-Universe parameters retained and re-fitted jointly with the ECDM extensions.
axioms (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Dark energy is a perfect fluid with rest-frame sound speed fixed to c_s^{2} = 1
    Stated in §4.1; the authors note that small positive values leave spectra unchanged, but the choice is not varied in the MCMC.
  • ad hoc to paper Background DE density follows the error-function profile of Eq. (3.1)
    Defines the ECDM model; recovers ΛsCDM only in the η → ∞ limit.
  • domain assumption Early-Universe physics (BBN, recombination, sound horizon) remains identical to ΛCDM
    Implicit throughout; the model is constructed so that only late-time expansion is modified.
  • domain assumption Linear scalar perturbations in Newtonian/synchronous gauge suffice for CMB and large-scale structure
    Standard cosmological assumption used to derive Eqs. (4.5) and (B.5).
invented entities (2)
  • Rescaled density contrast f_A ≡ δ_A / (1 + w_A) no independent evidence
    purpose: Removes the pole in the perturbation equations when ρ_d crosses zero, allowing stable numerical evolution through the transition.
    Introduced in §4.1; purely a mathematical redefinition of an existing fluid variable, not a new physical degree of freedom.
  • ECDM error-function dark-energy density no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a controllable smooth interpolation between negative and positive DE density.
    Phenomenological ansatz taken from earlier papers by the same authors; no microphysical derivation is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 44979 in / 2938 out tokens · 29836 ms · 2026-07-11T09:39:39.460854+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sign-switching dark energy has recently been proposed as a minimal modification of the late-time expansion history aimed at alleviating tensions within the standard cosmological model. In this work, we investigate ECDM, a smooth realisation of this scenario, with the dark energy density gradually transitioning from a negative to a positive value. We develop a consistent formulation of the perturbation equations that remains well behaved even when the dark energy equation-of-state parameter diverges during the transition. We confront the model with a comprehensive set of cosmological observations, including cosmic microwave background measurements from Planck 2018, ACT DR6 and SPT-3G, baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from DESI DR2, Type Ia supernova distances from Pantheon+, and local Hubble constant measurement of SH0ES. The inclusion of perturbations allows us to assess the impact of the model on structure growth and CMB anisotropies, providing a more thorough test of sign-switching dark energy. Our results show that this class of models is fully compatible with current precision cosmological observations while alleviating the Hubble tension and providing a compelling modification of the late-time dynamics of the Universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 148 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Eisenstein et al.,Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal633(2005) 560

    D.J. Eisenstein et al.,Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal633(2005) 560

  2. [2]

    S. Cole et al.,The 2df galaxy redshift survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society362(2005) 505

  3. [3]

    Percival et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the sloan digital sky survey data release 7 galaxy sample,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401(2010) 2148

    W.J. Percival et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the sloan digital sky survey data release 7 galaxy sample,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401(2010) 2148

  4. [4]

    Tegmark et al.,The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,The Astrophysical Journal606(2004) 702

    M. Tegmark et al.,The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,The Astrophysical Journal606(2004) 702

  5. [5]

    Reid et al.,Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the sloan digital sky survey dr7 luminous red galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society404(2010) 60

    B.A. Reid et al.,Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the sloan digital sky survey dr7 luminous red galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society404(2010) 60. [12]eBOSScollaboration,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache P...

  6. [6]

    Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys

    D. Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

  7. [7]

    Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

  8. [8]

    Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys

    D. Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys. J.986(2025) 231 [2311.12098]. – 34 – [16]DESIcollaboration, D.J. Schlegel et al.,A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5, 9, 2022. 10.2172/1887254. [17]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossi...

  9. [9]

    Elbers et al.,Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys

    W. Elbers et al.,Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083513 [2503.14744]. [24]DESIcollaboration,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083511 [2503.14743]. [25]DESIcollaboration,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmol...

  10. [10]

    Sabogal, R.C

    M.A. Sabogal, R.C. Nunes, F. Avila and A. Bernui,Updated cosmological constraints from 2D BAO measurements: a new compilation and comparison with DESI DR2,Eur. Phys. J. C86 (2026) 314 [2510.16141]

  11. [11]

    Jimenez and A

    R. Jimenez and A. Loeb,Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages, Astrophys. J.573(2002) 37 [astro-ph/0106145]

  12. [12]

    Moresco,Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers, 12, 2024

    M. Moresco,Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers, 12, 2024. [29]H0DNcollaboration,The Local Distance Network: A community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at∼1% precision,Astron. Astrophys.708(2026) A166 [2510.23823]

  13. [13]

    Freedman, B.F

    W.L. Freedman, B.F. Madore, T.J. Hoyt, I.S. Jang, A.J. Lee and K.A. Owens,Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes,Astrophys. J.985(2025) 203 [2408.06153]

  14. [14]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1

  15. [15]

    Sahni and A.A

    V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky,The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D09(2000) 373 [astro-ph/9904398]

  16. [16]

    Sahni,The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence,Class

    V. Sahni,The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence,Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) 3435 [astro-ph/0202076]. [34]CosmoVerse Networkcollaboration,The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 101965 [2504.01669]

  17. [17]

    Ratra and P.J.E

    B. Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles,Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3406. – 35 –

  18. [18]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov and P.J. Steinhardt,Essentials of k-essence,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 103510

  19. [19]

    Kamionkowski, J

    M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler and D.G.E. Walker,Dark energy from the string axiverse,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 251302 [1409.0549]

  20. [20]

    Emami, D

    R. Emami, D. Grin, J. Pradler, A. Raccanelli and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological tests of an axiverse-inspired quintessence field,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123005 [1603.04851]

  21. [21]

    Chiang, C.G

    H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza and M. Bouhmadi-López,Observational constraints on generalised axion-like potentials for the late Universe,JCAP08(2025) 064 [2503.04898]

  22. [22]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A.Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier,An Alternative to quintessence,Phys. Lett. B511(2001) 265 [gr-qc/0103004]

  23. [23]

    Koivisto and N.J

    T.S. Koivisto and N.J. Nunes,Inflation and dark energy from three-forms,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 103509 [0908.0920]

  24. [24]

    Koivisto and N.J

    T.S. Koivisto and N.J. Nunes,Three-form cosmology,Phys. Lett. B685(2010) 105 [0907.3883]

  25. [25]

    Morais, M

    J. Morais, M. Bouhmadi-López, K. Sravan Kumar, J. Marto and Y. Tavakoli,Interacting 3-form dark energy models: distinguishing interactions and avoiding the Little Sibling of the Big Rip,Phys. Dark Univ.15(2017) 7 [1608.01679]

  26. [26]

    Bouhmadi-López, J

    M. Bouhmadi-López, J. Marto, J. Morais and C.M. Silva,Cosmic infinity: A dynamical system approach,JCAP03(2017) 042 [1611.03100]

  27. [27]

    Bouhmadi-López, H.-W

    M. Bouhmadi-López, H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza and P. Chen,Observational constraints on 3-forms dark energy,JCAP06(2026) 084 [2512.09991]

  28. [28]

    Bouhmadi-López, H.-W

    M. Bouhmadi-López, H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza, J.O. del Río, T.J. Broadhurst and P. Chen, Three-form dark energy: constraints and multi-probe comparison withΛCDM, 6, 2026

  29. [29]

    Heisenberg,Generalization of the Proca Action,JCAP05(2014) 015 [1402.7026]

    L. Heisenberg,Generalization of the Proca Action,JCAP05(2014) 015 [1402.7026]

  30. [30]

    de Rham and V

    C. de Rham and V. Pozsgay,New class of Proca interactions,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083508 [2003.13773]

  31. [31]

    De Felice, C.-Q

    A. De Felice, C.-Q. Geng, M.C. Pookkillath and L. Yin,Reducing theH0 tension with generalized Proca theory,JCAP08(2020) 038 [2002.06782]

  32. [32]

    Chiang, C

    H.-W. Chiang, C. de Rham, S. Garcia-Saenz and X. Zhou,Cosmological tensions in Proca-Nuevo theory,JCAP06(2026) 076 [2511.21071]

  33. [33]

    Li, G.-H

    T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, P.-J. Wu, S.-J. Jin, J.-F. Zhang et al.,Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69(2026) 210413 [2501.07361]

  34. [34]

    T.-N. Li, W. Giarè, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, E. Di Valentino, J.-F. Zhang et al.,Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions, 1, 2026

  35. [35]

    Isham, A

    C.J. Isham, A. Salam and J. Strathdee,f-dominance of gravity,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 867

  36. [36]

    De Felice, F

    A. De Felice, F. Larrouturou, S. Mukohyama and M. Oliosi,Minimal Theory of Bigravity: construction and cosmology,JCAP04(2021) 015 [2012.01073]

  37. [37]

    Deffayet, O

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman,Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,JCAP10(2010) 026 [1008.0048]

  38. [38]

    Pujolas, I

    O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman,The Imperfect Fluid behind Kinetic Gravity Braiding, JHEP11(2011) 156 [1103.5360]. – 36 –

  39. [39]

    Borislavov Vasilev, M

    T. Borislavov Vasilev, M. Bouhmadi-López and P. Martín-Moruno,Phantom attractors in kinetic gravity braiding theories: a dynamical system approach,JCAP06(2023) 026 [2212.02547]

  40. [40]

    Borislavov Vasilev, M

    T. Borislavov Vasilev, M. Bouhmadi-López and P. Martín-Moruno,Dark energy with a shift-symmetric scalar field: Obstacles, loophole hunting and dead ends,Phys. Dark Univ.46 (2024) 101679 [2406.12576]

  41. [41]

    Sotiriou and V

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,f(R) Theories Of Gravity,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 451 [0805.1726]

  42. [42]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis,Extended Theories of Gravity,Phys. Rept.509(2011) 167 [1108.6266]

  43. [43]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,Phys. Rept.505(2011) 59 [1011.0544]

  44. [44]

    Bouhmadi-López, S

    M. Bouhmadi-López, S. Capozziello and V.F. Cardone,Cosmography of f(R) - brane cosmology,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 103526 [1010.1547]

  45. [45]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou,Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution,Phys. Rept.692(2017) 1 [1705.11098]

  46. [46]

    Morais, M

    J. Morais, M. Bouhmadi-López and S. Capozziello,Canf(R)gravity contribute to (dark) radiation?,JCAP09(2015) 041 [1507.02623]

  47. [47]

    Bengochea and R

    G.R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro,Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 124019 [0812.1205]

  48. [48]

    Ferraro and F

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 084031 [gr-qc/0610067]

  49. [49]

    Y.-F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and E.N. Saridakis,f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 106901 [1511.07586]

  50. [50]

    Bouhmadi-López, C.G

    M. Bouhmadi-López, C.G. Boiza, M. Petronikolou and E.N. Saridakis,Modified Teleparallel f(T) Gravity, DESI BAO and the H0 Tension,Universe12(2026) 81 [2601.22225]

  51. [51]

    Beltrán Jiménez, L

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg and T.S. Koivisto,Teleparallel Palatini theories,JCAP08 (2018) 039 [1803.10185]

  52. [52]

    Beltrán Jiménez, L

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg, T.S. Koivisto and S. Pekar,Cosmology inf(Q)geometry, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103507 [1906.10027]

  53. [53]

    Hashim, W

    M. Hashim, W. El Hanafy, A. Golovnev and A.A. El-Zant,Toward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part I. Background dynamics,JCAP07(2021) 052 [2010.14964]

  54. [54]

    Hashim, A.A

    M. Hashim, A.A. El-Zant, W. El Hanafy and A. Golovnev,Toward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part II. Linear perturbation,JCAP07(2021) 053 [2104.08311]

  55. [55]

    Ayuso, R

    I. Ayuso, R. Lazkoz and V. Salzano,Observational constraints on cosmological solutions of f(Q)theories,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063505 [2012.00046]

  56. [56]

    Boiza, M

    C.G. Boiza, M. Petronikolou, M. Bouhmadi-López and E.N. Saridakis,Addressing H0 and S 8 tensions within f(Q) cosmology,JCAP12(2025) 011 [2505.18264]

  57. [57]

    Ayuso, M

    I. Ayuso, M. Bouhmadi-López, C.-Y. Chen, X.Y. Chew, K. Dialektopoulos and Y.C. Ong, Insights in f(Q) cosmology: the relevance of the connection,JCAP11(2025) 068 [2506.03506]

  58. [58]

    Capozziello, V

    S. Capozziello, V. De Falco and C. Ferrara,The role of the boundary term in f(Q, B) symmetric teleparallel gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 915 [2307.13280]

  59. [59]

    De, T.-H

    A. De, T.-H. Loo and E.N. Saridakis,Non-metricity with boundary terms:f(Q,C) gravity and cosmology,JCAP03(2024) 050 [2308.00652]. – 37 –

  60. [60]

    Bahamonde, C.G

    S. Bahamonde, C.G. Böhmer and M. Wright,Modified teleparallel theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 104042 [1508.05120]

  61. [61]

    Bahamonde, K.F

    S. Bahamonde, K.F. Dialektopoulos and J. Levi Said,Can Horndeski Theory be recast using Teleparallel Gravity?,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 064018 [1904.10791]

  62. [62]

    Lamaaoune,Exploring the universe expansion history with f(R,T) gravity: Constraints on cosmological parameters,Phys

    M. Lamaaoune,Exploring the universe expansion history with f(R,T) gravity: Constraints on cosmological parameters,Phys. Lett. B873(2026) 140134

  63. [63]

    Akarsu, S

    O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. Özülker and J.A. Vazquez,Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123512 [2108.09239]

  64. [64]

    Akarsu, S

    O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. Özülker, J.A. Vazquez and A. Yadav,Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant: Improved results with Planck, BAO, and Pantheon data,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023513 [2211.05742]

  65. [65]

    Akarsu, E

    O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, J.A. Vazquez and A. Yadav,ΛsCDM model: A promising scenario for alleviation of cosmological tensions, 7, 2023

  66. [66]

    Paraskevas, A

    E.A. Paraskevas, A. Cam, L. Perivolaropoulos and O. Akarsu,Transition dynamics in the ΛsCDM model: Implications for bound cosmic structures,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103522 [2402.05908]

  67. [67]

    Yadav, S

    A. Yadav, S. Kumar, C. Kibris and O. Akarsu,ΛsCDM cosmology: alleviating major cosmological tensions by predicting standard neutrino properties,JCAP01(2025) 042 [2406.18496]

  68. [68]

    Akarsu, A

    Ö. Akarsu, A. De Felice, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, E. Özülker et al.,ΛsCDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.546(2026) staf2276 [2402.07716]

  69. [69]

    Akarsu, A

    O. Akarsu, A. De Felice, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, E. Özülker et al., Cosmological constraints onΛsCDM scenario in a type II minimally modified gravity,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103527 [2406.07526]

  70. [70]

    Akarsu, B

    O. Akarsu, B. Bulduk, A. De Felice, N. Katırcı and N.M. Uzun,Unexplored regions in teleparallel f(T) gravity: Sign-changing dark energy density,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083532 [2410.23068]

  71. [71]

    Souza, A.M

    M.S. Souza, A.M. Barcelos, R.C. Nunes, O. Akarsu and S. Kumar,Mapping theΛsCDM Scenario to f(T) Modified Gravity: Effects on Structure Growth Rate,Universe11(2025) 2 [2501.18031]

  72. [72]

    Akarsu, L

    O. Akarsu, L. Perivolaropoulos, A. Tsikoundoura, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Dynamical dark energy with AdS-to-dS and dS-to-dS transitions: Implications for theH0 tension, 2, 2025

  73. [73]

    Akarsu, M

    O. Akarsu, M. Eingorn, L. Perivolaropoulos, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Dynamical dark energy with AdS-dS transitions vs. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations atz=2.3-2.4, 4, 2025

  74. [74]

    Akarsu, A

    Ö. Akarsu, A. Çam, E.A. Paraskevas and L. Perivolaropoulos,Linear matter density perturbations in theΛsCDM model: Examining growth dynamics and addressing the S8 tension,JCAP08(2025) 089 [2502.20384]

  75. [75]

    Escamilla, O

    L.A. Escamilla, O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, E. Özülker and J.A. Vazquez,Exploring the Growth-Index (γ) Tension withΛsCDM, 3, 2025

  76. [76]

    Akarsu, E

    Ö. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, J. Vyskočil, E. Yılmaz, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Nonlinear matter power spectrum from relativistic N-body simulations:ΛsCDM versusΛCDM,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 083508 [2510.18741]

  77. [77]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Anti-de Sitter→de Sitter transition driven by Casimir forces and mitigating tensions in cosmological parameters,Phys. Lett. B855(2024) 138775 [2312.12352]. – 38 –

  78. [78]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Lust, N.T. Noble and J.F. Soriano,From infinite to infinitesimal: Using the universe as a dataset to probe Casimir corrections to the vacuum energy from fields inhabiting the dark dimension,Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024) 101715 [2404.17334]

  79. [79]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Bielli, A. Chatrabhuti and H. Isono,Thin-wall vacuum decay in the presence of a compact dimension meets the H0 and S8 tensions,JHEP07(2025) 021 [2410.18649]

  80. [80]

    Soriano, S

    J.F. Soriano, S. Wohlberg and L.A. Anchordoqui,New insights on a sign-switchingΛ,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101911 [2502.19239]

Showing first 80 references.