Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reproducible Subjective Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.04444 v1 pith:5JGTY6OR submitted 2022-03-08 cs.HC cs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.LG
keywords evaluationsubjectiveevaluationsresearchersresevalaudiohumanimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human perceptual studies are the gold standard for the evaluation of many research tasks in machine learning, linguistics, and psychology. However, these studies require significant time and cost to perform. As a result, many researchers use objective measures that can correlate poorly with human evaluation. When subjective evaluations are performed, they are often not reported with sufficient detail to ensure reproducibility. We propose Reproducible Subjective Evaluation (ReSEval), an open-source framework for quickly deploying crowdsourced subjective evaluations directly from Python. ReSEval lets researchers launch A/B, ABX, Mean Opinion Score (MOS) and MUltiple Stimuli with Hidden Reference and Anchor (MUSHRA) tests on audio, image, text, or video data from a command-line interface or using one line of Python, making it as easy to run as objective evaluation. With ReSEval, researchers can reproduce each other's subjective evaluations by sharing a configuration file and the audio, image, text, or video files.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Crowdsourcing MUSHRA Tests in the Age of Generative Speech Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Subjective and Objective Testing Methods

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Crowdsourced MUSHRA tests on Prolific and MTurk reproduce expert codec rankings for generative speech codecs, and SCOREQ tracks subjective quality more consistently than PESQ, POLQA, or ViSQOL.

Pith tools