Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Fast and flexible inference for joint models of multivariate longitudinal and survival data using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations

Methodology · Submitted 11 Mar 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim R-INLA provides a fast and reliable inference technique for applying joint models to the complex multivariate data encountered in health research.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2203.06256 (version 4)
Pith IDB7I4ZXWK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC\'ecile Proust-Lima, Denis Rustand, Elias Teixeira Krainski, H{\aa}vard Rue, Janet Van Niekerk. "Fast and flexible inference for joint models of multivariate longitudinal and survival data using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations." arXiv:2203.06256 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/B7I4ZXWK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,784 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.92 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.05 · states quantitative result 0.71 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.15.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Modeling longitudinal and survival data jointly offers many advantages such as addressing measurement error and missing data in the longitudinal processes, understanding and quantifying the association between the longitudinal markers and the survival events and predicting the risk of events based on the longitudinal markers. A joint model involves multiple submodels (one for each longitudinal/survival outcome) usually linked together through correlated or shared random effects. Their estimation is computationally expensive (particularly due to a multidimensional integration of the likelihood over the random effects distribution) so that inference methods become rapidly intractable, and restricts applications of joint models to a small number of longitudinal markers and/or random effects. We introduce a Bayesian approximation based on the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation algorithm implemented in the R package R-INLA to alleviate the computational burden and allow the estimation of multivariate joint models with fewer restrictions. Our simulation studies show that R-INLA substantially reduces the computation time and the variability of the parameter estimates compared to alternative estimation strategies. We further apply the methodology to analyze 5 longitudinal markers (3 continuous, 1 count, 1 binary, and 16 random effects) and competing risks of death and transplantation in a clinical trial on primary biliary cholangitis. R-INLA provides a fast and reliable inference technique for applying joint models to the complex multivariate data encountered in health research.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Modeling longitudinal and survival data jointly offers many advantages such as addressing measurement error and missing data in the longitudinal processes, understanding and quantifying the association between the longitudinal markers and the survival events and predicting the risk of events based on the longitudinal markers. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.96
s1 A joint model involves multiple submodels (one for each longitudinal/survival outcome) usually linked together through correlated or shared random effects. background 0.99 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Their estimation is computationally expensive (particularly due to a multidimensional integration of the likelihood over the random effects distribution) so that inference methods become rapidly intractable, and restricts applications of joint models to a small number of longitudinal markers and/or random effects. background 0.61 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 We introduce a Bayesian approximation based on the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation algorithm implemented in the R package R-INLA to alleviate the computational burden and allow the estimation of multivariate joint models with fewer restrictions. contribution 0.86 0.92 0.22 asserted 1.00
s4 Our simulation studies show that R-INLA substantially reduces the computation time and the variability of the parameter estimates compared to alternative estimation strategies. result 1.00 0.97 0.20 asserted 1.00
s5 We further apply the methodology to analyze 5 longitudinal markers (3 continuous, 1 count, 1 binary, and 16 random effects) and competing risks of death and transplantation in a clinical trial on primary biliary cholangitis. contribution 0.58 0.97 0.05 asserted 0.96
s6 R-INLA provides a fast and reliable inference technique for applying joint models to the complex multivariate data encountered in health research. interpretation 0.93 0.65 0.87 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Modeling longitudinal and survival data jointly offers many advantages such as addressing measurement error and missing data in the longitudinal processes, understanding and quantifying the association between the longitudinal markers and the survival events and predicting the risk of events based on the longitudinal markers. A joint model involves multiple submodels (one for each longitudinal/survival outcome) usually linked together through correlated or shared random effects. Their estimation is computationally expensive (particularly due to a multidimensional integration of the likelihood over the random effects distribution) so that inference methods become rapidly intractable, and restricts applications of joint models to a small number of longitudinal markers and/or random effects. We introduce a Bayesian approximation based on the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation algorithm implemented in the R package R-INLA to alleviate the computational burden and allow the estimation of multivariate joint models with fewer restrictions. Our simulation studies show that R-INLA substantially reduces the computation time and the variability of the parameter estimates compared to alternative estimation strategies. We further apply the methodology to analyze 5 longitudinal markers (3 continuous, 1 count, 1 binary, and 16 random effects) and competing risks of death and transplantation in a clinical trial on primary biliary cholangitis. R-INLA provides a fast and reliable inference technique for applying joint models to the complex multivariate data encountered in health research.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.