REVIEW 1 cited by
Possible in situ formation of Uranus and Neptune via Pebble Accretion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The origin of Uranus and Neptune is still unknown. In particular, it has been challenging for planet formation models to form the planets in their current radial distances within the expected lifetime of the solar nebula. In this paper, we simulate the in-situ formation of Uranus and Neptune via pebble accretion and show that both planets can form within ~ 3 Myr at their current locations, and have final compositions that are consistent with the heavy-element to H-He ratios predicted by structure models. We find that Uranus and Neptune could have been formed at their current locations. In several cases a few earth masses of heavy elements are missing, suggesting that Uranus and/or Neptune may have accreted $\sim$1 -- 3 M Earth's mass of heavy elements after their formation via planetesimal accretion and/or giant impacts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Accretion of Uranus and Neptune: confronting different giant impact scenarios
Both the equal-mass-embryo scenario and the high-mass-ratio impact scenario form Uranus and Neptune analogues with comparable low probability (~0.1-1%), so neither is dynamically preferred.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.