Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Bruce-Roberts Numbers of a Function on an ICIS

Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 21 Mar 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We give formulas for the Bruce-Roberts number $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ and its relative version $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)$ of a function $f$ with respect to an ICIS $(X,0)$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2203.11186 (version 1)
Pith IDBDUI5IGC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB\'arbara K. Lima-Pereira, Bruna Or\'efice-Okamoto, Jo\~ao Nivaldo Tomazella, Juan Jos\'e Nu\~no-Ballesteros. "The Bruce-Roberts Numbers of a Function on an ICIS." arXiv:2203.11186 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/BDUI5IGC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,143 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.51 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We give formulas for the Bruce-Roberts number $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ and its relative version $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)$ of a function $f$ with respect to an ICIS $(X,0)$. We show that $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)=\mu(f^{-1}(0)\cap X,0)+\mu(X,0)-\tau(X,0)$, where $\mu$ and $\tau$ are the Milnor and Tjurina numbers, respectively, of the ICIS. The formula for $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ is more complicated and also involves $\mu(f)$ and some lengths in terms of the ideals $I_X$ and $Jf$. We also consider the logarithmic characteristic variety, $LC(X)$, and its relative version, $LC(X)^{-}$. We show that $LC(X)^{-}$ is Cohen-Macaulay and that $LC(X)$ is Cohen-Macaulay at any point not in $X\times\{0\}$. We generalize previous results presented by the authors when $(X,0)$ has codimension one and by Bruce and Roberts when it is weighted homogeneous of any codimension.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We give formulas for the Bruce-Roberts number $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ and its relative version $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)$ of a function $f$ with respect to an ICIS $(X,0)$. contribution 0.80 0.96 0.50 asserted 1.00
s1 We show that $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)=\mu(f^{-1}(0)\cap X,0)+\mu(X,0)-\tau(X,0)$, where $\mu$ and $\tau$ are the Milnor and Tjurina numbers, respectively, of the ICIS. result 0.99 0.94 0.43 asserted 1.00
s2 The formula for $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ is more complicated and also involves $\mu(f)$ and some lengths in terms of the ideals $I_X$ and $Jf$. result 0.84 0.92 0.14 asserted 1.00
s3 We also consider the logarithmic characteristic variety, $LC(X)$, and its relative version, $LC(X)^{-}$. contribution 0.99 0.76 0.04 asserted 0.69
s4 We show that $LC(X)^{-}$ is Cohen-Macaulay and that $LC(X)$ is Cohen-Macaulay at any point not in $X\times\{0\}$. result 0.99 0.94 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 We generalize previous results presented by the authors when $(X,0)$ has codimension one and by Bruce and Roberts when it is weighted homogeneous of any codimension. contribution 0.80 0.70 0.12 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We give formulas for the Bruce-Roberts number $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ and its relative version $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)$ of a function $f$ with respect to an ICIS $(X,0)$. We show that $\mu_{BR}^{-}(f,X)=\mu(f^{-1}(0)\cap X,0)+\mu(X,0)-\tau(X,0)$, where $\mu$ and $\tau$ are the Milnor and Tjurina numbers, respectively, of the ICIS. The formula for $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ is more complicated and also involves $\mu(f)$ and some lengths in terms of the ideals $I_X$ and $Jf$. We also consider the logarithmic characteristic variety, $LC(X)$, and its relative version, $LC(X)^{-}$. We show that $LC(X)^{-}$ is Cohen-Macaulay and that $LC(X)$ is Cohen-Macaulay at any point not in $X\times\{0\}$. We generalize previous results presented by the authors when $(X,0)$ has codimension one and by Bruce and Roberts when it is weighted homogeneous of any codimension.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Since $f_2$ has isolated singularity at the origin, $X∩{f_2=0}$ is an ICIS and $𝒱={W∖{f_2=0}, W∩{f_2=0}∖{0}, {0}, W∈𝒲}$ is a good stratification of $X$ induced by $f_2.$ In [ref] , the authors proved that the relative logarithmic characteristic variety $LC(X∩{f_2=0})^-$ of $X∩{f_2=0}$ is Cohen-Macaulay, since $X∩{f_2=0}$ is an ICIS.

    Relative Bruce-Roberts number and Chern obstruction · The particular case of an ICIS · 0.97

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.