REVIEW 1 cited by
Efficient Classification of Long Documents Using Transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Several methods have been proposed for classifying long textual documents using Transformers. However, there is a lack of consensus on a benchmark to enable a fair comparison among different approaches. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the relative efficacy measured against various baselines and diverse datasets -- both in terms of accuracy as well as time and space overheads. Our datasets cover binary, multi-class, and multi-label classification tasks and represent various ways information is organized in a long text (e.g. information that is critical to making the classification decision is at the beginning or towards the end of the document). Our results show that more complex models often fail to outperform simple baselines and yield inconsistent performance across datasets. These findings emphasize the need for future studies to consider comprehensive baselines and datasets that better represent the task of long document classification to develop robust models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quizzard@INOVA Challenge 2025 -- Track A: Plug-and-Play Technique in Interleaved Multi-Image Model
Standard fine-tuned LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave outscores its DCI-enhanced variant on overall validation accuracy, though the DCI variant wins on coherence and slide-question tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.