Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How well does CLIP understand texture?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.11449 v2 pith:KDTADYKL submitted 2022-03-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords textureclipdescribednaturalwellabilityanalyzebirds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate how well CLIP understands texture in natural images described by natural language. To this end, we analyze CLIP's ability to: (1) perform zero-shot learning on various texture and material classification datasets; (2) represent compositional properties of texture such as red dots or yellow stripes on the Describable Texture in Detail(DTDD) dataset; and (3) aid fine-grained categorization of birds in photographs described by color and texture of their body parts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ADAM: Autonomous Discovery and Annotation Model using LLMs for Context-Aware Annotations

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ADAM combines LLM-generated contextual labels, CLIP embeddings, and nearest-neighbor voting to label novel objects without a predefined class list.

Pith tools