Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Are High-Resolution Event Cameras Really Needed?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.14672 v1 pith:SEJFMOBZ submitted 2022-03-28 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords eventcamerashigh-resolutionhigherconditionslowertasksbandwidth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to their outstanding properties in challenging conditions, event cameras have become indispensable in a wide range of applications, ranging from automotive, computational photography, and SLAM. However, as further improvements are made to the sensor design, modern event cameras are trending toward higher and higher sensor resolutions, which result in higher bandwidth and computational requirements on downstream tasks. Despite this trend, the benefits of using high-resolution event cameras to solve standard computer vision tasks are still not clear. In this work, we report the surprising discovery that, in low-illumination conditions and at high speeds, low-resolution cameras can outperform high-resolution ones, while requiring a significantly lower bandwidth. We provide both empirical and theoretical evidence for this claim, which indicates that high-resolution event cameras exhibit higher per-pixel event rates, leading to higher temporal noise in low-illumination conditions and at high speeds. As a result, in most cases, high-resolution event cameras show a lower task performance, compared to lower resolution sensors in these conditions. We empirically validate our findings across several tasks, namely image reconstruction, optical flow estimation, and camera pose tracking, both on synthetic and real data. We believe that these findings will provide important guidelines for future trends in event camera development.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Event-Based Spatial-Carrier Interferometry for Surface-Normal Vibration-Waveform Reconstruction

    physics.app-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying spatial-carrier demodulation to event-camera fringe motion reconstructs out-of-plane vibration waveforms, with accuracy validated against laser Doppler vibrometry over broad frequency and amplitude ranges.

  2. Efficient Event-Based Semantic Segmentation via Exploiting Frame-Event Fusion: A Hybrid Neural Network Approach

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A frame-event fusion framework with ANN and SNN branches achieves state-of-the-art semantic segmentation on DDD17-Seg, DSEC-Semantic and a new M3ED-Semantic subset, with a reported 65% energy reduction on DSEC-Semantic.

  3. Event Camera Guided Visual Media Restoration & 3D Reconstruction: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A structured survey of event-camera-guided video restoration and 3D reconstruction, organized by temporal, spatial, and 3D tasks.

Pith tools