Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Transferable Speech Emotion Representation: On loss functions for cross-lingual latent representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.14865 v1 pith:YVB6ZKDX submitted 2022-03-28 eess.AS cs.SD

Towards Transferable Speech Emotion Representation: On loss functions for cross-lingual latent representations

classification eess.AS cs.SD
keywords latentclassificationaccuracydataembeddingemotionlanguagesmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In recent years, speech emotion recognition (SER) has been used in wide ranging applications, from healthcare to the commercial sector. In addition to signal processing approaches, methods for SER now also use deep learning techniques which provide transfer learning possibilities. However, generalizing over languages, corpora and recording conditions is still an open challenge. In this work we address this gap by exploring loss functions that aid in transferability, specifically to non-tonal languages. We propose a variational autoencoder (VAE) with KL annealing and a semi-supervised VAE to obtain more consistent latent embedding distributions across data sets. To ensure transferability, the distribution of the latent embedding should be similar across non-tonal languages (data sets). We start by presenting a low-complexity SER based on a denoising-autoencoder, which achieves an unweighted classification accuracy of over 52.09% for four-class emotion classification. This performance is comparable to that of similar baseline methods. Following this, we employ a VAE, the semi-supervised VAE and the VAE with KL annealing to obtain a more regularized latent space. We show that while the DAE has the highest classification accuracy among the methods, the semi-supervised VAE has a comparable classification accuracy and a more consistent latent embedding distribution over data sets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.