Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fine-grained Temporal Contrastive Learning for Weakly-supervised Temporal Action Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.16800 v1 pith:EYPZLFVN submitted 2022-03-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords actioncontrastingfine-grainedlearninglocalizationtemporalavailableclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We target at the task of weakly-supervised action localization (WSAL), where only video-level action labels are available during model training. Despite the recent progress, existing methods mainly embrace a localization-by-classification paradigm and overlook the fruitful fine-grained temporal distinctions between video sequences, thus suffering from severe ambiguity in classification learning and classification-to-localization adaption. This paper argues that learning by contextually comparing sequence-to-sequence distinctions offers an essential inductive bias in WSAL and helps identify coherent action instances. Specifically, under a differentiable dynamic programming formulation, two complementary contrastive objectives are designed, including Fine-grained Sequence Distance (FSD) contrasting and Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) contrasting, where the first one considers the relations of various action/background proposals by using match, insert, and delete operators and the second one mines the longest common subsequences between two videos. Both contrasting modules can enhance each other and jointly enjoy the merits of discriminative action-background separation and alleviated task gap between classification and localization. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on two popular benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/MengyuanChen21/CVPR2022-FTCL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TimeProVe: Propose, then Verify for Efficient Long Video Temporal Reasoning in Activities of Daily Living

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    TimeProVe proposes a propose-then-verify framework using lightweight action-based candidate evidence generation followed by targeted VLM verification for efficient long video temporal reasoning, achieving 7.3% improve...

Pith tools