REVIEW 2 cited by
Real-Time and Robust 3D Object Detection Within Road-Side LiDARs Using Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This work aims to address the challenges in domain adaptation of 3D object detection using infrastructure LiDARs. We design a model DASE-ProPillars that can detect vehicles in infrastructure-based LiDARs in real-time. Our model uses PointPillars as the baseline model with additional modules to improve the 3D detection performance. To prove the effectiveness of our proposed modules in DASE-ProPillars, we train and evaluate the model on two datasets, the open source A9-Dataset and a semi-synthetic infrastructure dataset created within the Regensburg Next project. We do several sets of experiments for each module in the DASE-ProPillars detector that show that our model outperforms the SE-ProPillars baseline on the real A9 test set and a semi-synthetic A9 test set, while maintaining an inference speed of 45 Hz (22 ms). We apply domain adaptation from the semi-synthetic A9-Dataset to the semi-synthetic dataset from the Regensburg Next project by applying transfer learning and achieve a 3D mAP@0.25 of 93.49% on the Car class of the target test set using 40 recall positions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Safety-Critical Learning for Long-Tail Events: The TUM Traffic Accident Dataset
A dataset of real highway accidents with 2D/3D labels and a detection framework, presented without any detection accuracy evaluation.
-
Few-Shot Learning in Video and 3D Object Detection: A Survey
A survey of few-shot learning for video and 3D object detection that reviews architectures, losses, and training strategies, but contains numerous citation errors and unsupported performance claims.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.