Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning to Simplify with Data Hopelessly Out of Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.00741 v1 pith:VLQSIFVD submitted 2022-04-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords networksjs-ganmadesentencessometwinadversarialalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider whether it is possible to do text simplification without relying on a "parallel" corpus, one that is made up of sentence-by-sentence alignments of complex and ground truth simple sentences. To this end, we introduce a number of concepts, some new and some not, including what we call Conjoined Twin Networks, Flip-Flop Auto-Encoders (FFA) and Adversarial Networks (GAN). A comparison is made between Jensen-Shannon (JS-GAN) and Wasserstein GAN, to see how they impact performance, with stronger results for the former. An experiment we conducted with a large dataset derived from Wikipedia found the solid superiority of Twin Networks equipped with FFA and JS-GAN, over the current best performing system. Furthermore, we discuss where we stand in a relation to fully supervised methods in the past literature, and highlight with examples qualitative differences that exist among simplified sentences generated by supervision-free systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools