Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparison of Deep Learning MOS Predictors for Speech Synthesis Quality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.02249 v2 pith:XPWXV7CZ submitted 2022-04-05 eess.AS

A Comparison of Deep Learning MOS Predictors for Speech Synthesis Quality

classification eess.AS
keywords modelspredictorsdataqualityspeechlearningpredictionrole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Speech synthesis quality prediction has made remarkable progress with the development of supervised and self-supervised learning (SSL) MOS predictors but some aspects related to the data are still unclear and require further study. In this paper, we evaluate several MOS predictors based on wav2vec 2.0 and the NISQA speech quality prediction model to explore the role of the training data, the influence of the system type, and the role of cross-domain features in SSL models. Our evaluation is based on the VoiceMOS challenge dataset. Results show that SSL-based models show the highest correlation and lowest mean squared error compared to supervised models. The key point of this study is that benchmarking the statistical performance of MOS predictors alone is not sufficient to rank models since potential issues hidden in the data could bias the evaluated performances.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.