REVIEW 2 cited by
VALUE: Understanding Dialect Disparity in NLU
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
English Natural Language Understanding (NLU) systems have achieved great performances and even outperformed humans on benchmarks like GLUE and SuperGLUE. However, these benchmarks contain only textbook Standard American English (SAE). Other dialects have been largely overlooked in the NLP community. This leads to biased and inequitable NLU systems that serve only a sub-population of speakers. To understand disparities in current models and to facilitate more dialect-competent NLU systems, we introduce the VernAcular Language Understanding Evaluation (VALUE) benchmark, a challenging variant of GLUE that we created with a set of lexical and morphosyntactic transformation rules. In this initial release (V.1), we construct rules for 11 features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE), and we recruit fluent AAVE speakers to validate each feature transformation via linguistic acceptability judgments in a participatory design manner. Experiments show that these new dialectal features can lead to a drop in model performance. To run the transformation code and download both synthetic and gold-standard dialectal GLUE benchmarks, see https://github.com/SALT-NLP/value
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Using Contextually Aligned Online Reviews to Measure LLMs' Performance Disparities Across Language Varieties
LLMs predict sentiment worse on Taiwan Mandarin than Mainland Mandarin reviews, using a new contextually paired dataset from Booking.com.
-
The Generative AI Ethics Playbook
A structured playbook that collects existing guidance, checklists, and case studies to help generative AI practitioners identify and mitigate ethical harms across six lifecycle stages.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.