REVIEW 3 cited by
Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We analyze various methods for single-label and multi-label text classification across well-known datasets, categorizing them into bag-of-words, sequence-based, graph-based, and hierarchical approaches. Despite the surge in methods like graph-based models, encoder-only pre-trained language models, notably BERT, remain state-of-the-art. However, recent findings suggest simpler models like logistic regression and trigram-based SVMs outperform newer techniques. While decoder-only generative language models show promise in learning with limited data, they lag behind encoder-only models in performance. We emphasize the superiority of discriminative language models like BERT over generative models for supervised tasks. Additionally, we highlight the literature's lack of robustness in method comparisons, particularly concerning basic hyperparameter optimizations like learning rate in fine-tuning encoder-only language models. Data availability: The source code is available at https://github.com/drndr/multilabel-text-clf All datasets used for our experiments are publicly available except the NYT dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Four Shades of Life Sciences: A Dataset for Disinformation Detection in the Life Sciences
Introduces FSoLS, a four-class labeled corpus of 2,603 full-text life-science articles, and benchmarks language models that classify disinformative texts with up to 98% F1.
-
Influence of Prompt Engineering on Small Language Models for Guarded Query Routing
Few-shot prompt optimization lifts small language models' guarded-routing scores on GQR-Bench, bringing Qwen3.5 9B to 95.74, within 0.3 points of Gemma 3 27B without weight updates.
-
A Fisher's exact test justification of the TF-IDF term-weighting scheme
Under restrictive conditions, the negative log p-value of a one-tailed Fisher's exact test expands to TF-ICF (or TF-IDF) plus correction terms that contain the p-value tail itself.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.