Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Exploratory Study of Attestation Mechanisms for Trusted Execution Environments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.06790 v2 pith:ZITSXTFJ submitted 2022-04-14 cs.CR cs.DC

Jämes Ménétrey , Christian Göttel , Marcelo Pasin , Pascal Felber , Valerio Schiavoni This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CRcs.DC
keywords attestationenvironmentsexecutiontrustedwhenadoptionapplicationattackers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Attestation is a fundamental building block to establish trust over software systems. When used in conjunction with trusted execution environments, it guarantees that genuine code is executed even when facing strong attackers, paving the way for adoption in several sensitive application domains. This paper reviews existing remote attestation principles and compares the functionalities of current trusted execution environments as Intel SGX, Arm TrustZone and AMD SEV, as well as emerging RISC-V solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Narrowing the Gap between TEEs Threat Model and Deployment Strategies

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    TEE attestation should include a hardware-bound platform identifier (PPID) so users can verify which cloud provider's infrastructure hosts a confidential VM.

Pith tools