Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Exploring new states of matter with a photonic emulator

Optics · Submitted 14 Apr 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The present study constitutes an important first step towards waveguide-based simulations of phenomena relevant for high-energy physics.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2204.06887 (version 1)
Pith IDFBXEZC4E, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlexander Szameit, Felix Karbstein, Holger Gies, Simon St\"utzer. "Exploring new states of matter with a photonic emulator." arXiv:2204.06887 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/FBXEZC4E
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,281 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.30 · states limitation 0.56 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We implement the equation of motion of the large-N Gross-Neveu model from strong interaction physics in photonic waveguide arrays and study one of its paradigmatic multi-fermion bound state solutions in an optical experiment. The present study constitutes an important first step towards waveguide-based simulations of phenomena relevant for high-energy physics.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We implement the equation of motion of the large-N Gross-Neveu model from strong interaction physics in photonic waveguide arrays and study one of its paradigmatic multi-fermion bound state solutions in an optical experiment. contribution 0.86 0.96 0.22 asserted 1.00
s1 The present study constitutes an important first step towards waveguide-based simulations of phenomena relevant for high-energy physics. interpretation 0.59 0.29 0.30 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.90 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We implement the equation of motion of the large-N Gross-Neveu model from strong interaction physics in photonic waveguide arrays and study one of its paradigmatic multi-fermion bound state solutions in an optical experiment. The present study constitutes an important first step towards waveguide-based simulations of phenomena relevant for high-energy physics.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.