REVIEW 1 cited by
BLISS: Robust Sequence-to-Sequence Learning via Self-Supervised Input Representation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Data augmentations (DA) are the cores to achieving robust sequence-to-sequence learning on various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, most of the DA approaches force the decoder to make predictions conditioned on the perturbed input representation, underutilizing supervised information provided by perturbed input. In this work, we propose a framework-level robust sequence-to-sequence learning approach, named BLISS, via self-supervised input representation, which has the great potential to complement the data-level augmentation approaches. The key idea is to supervise the sequence-to-sequence framework with both the \textit{supervised} ("input$\rightarrow$output") and \textit{self-supervised} ("perturbed input$\rightarrow$input") information. We conduct comprehensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of BLISS on various tasks, including machine translation, grammatical error correction, and text summarization. The results show that BLISS outperforms significantly the vanilla Transformer and consistently works well across tasks than the other five contrastive baselines. Extensive analyses reveal that BLISS learns robust representations and rich linguistic knowledge, confirming our claim. Source code will be released upon publication.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MPipeMoE: Memory Efficient MoE for Pre-trained Models with Adaptive Pipeline Parallelism
MPipeMoE speeds up MoE training by adaptively pipelining token batches and reusing memory buffers across partitions, achieving up to 2.8x speedup and 47% memory reduction over FasterMoE.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.