Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Effect of Random Histogram Equalization on Breast Calcification Analysis Using Deep Learning

Image and Video Processing · Submitted 3 May 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this work, we demonstrate that randomly equalizing the histograms of calcification patches as a data augmentation technique can significantly improve the classification performance for analyzing suspicious calcifications.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2205.01684 (version 1)
Pith IDBL7OSM22, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAdarsh Bhandary Panambur, Andreas Maier, Prathmesh Madhu. "Effect of Random Histogram Equalization on Breast Calcification Analysis Using Deep Learning." arXiv:2205.01684 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/BL7OSM22
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,582 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.41 · controlled comparison 0.95 · randomized assignment 0.07 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Early detection and analysis of calcifications in mammogram images is crucial in a breast cancer diagnosis workflow. Management of calcifications that require immediate follow-up and further analyzing its benignancy or malignancy can result in a better prognosis. Recent studies have shown that deep learning-based algorithms can learn robust representations to analyze suspicious calcifications in mammography. In this work, we demonstrate that randomly equalizing the histograms of calcification patches as a data augmentation technique can significantly improve the classification performance for analyzing suspicious calcifications. We validate our approach by using the CBIS-DDSM dataset for two classification tasks. The results on both the tasks show that the proposed methodology gains more than 1% mean accuracy and F1-score when equalizing the data with a probability of 0.4 when compared to not using histogram equalization. This is further supported by the t-tests, where we obtain a p-value of p<0.0001, thus showing the statistical significance of our approach.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Early detection and analysis of calcifications in mammogram images is crucial in a breast cancer diagnosis workflow. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Management of calcifications that require immediate follow-up and further analyzing its benignancy or malignancy can result in a better prognosis. background 0.99 0.05 0.02 hedged possibility 0.63
s2 Recent studies have shown that deep learning-based algorithms can learn robust representations to analyze suspicious calcifications in mammography. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 0.99
s3 In this work, we demonstrate that randomly equalizing the histograms of calcification patches as a data augmentation technique can significantly improve the classification performance for analyzing suspicious calcifications. contribution 0.95 0.93 0.92 asserted 1.00
s4 We validate our approach by using the CBIS-DDSM dataset for two classification tasks. method 0.99 0.92 0.03 asserted 0.98
s5 The results on both the tasks show that the proposed methodology gains more than 1% mean accuracy and F1-score when equalizing the data with a probability of 0.4 when compared to not using histogram equalization. result 1.00 0.97 0.35 asserted 1.00
s6 This is further supported by the t-tests, where we obtain a p-value of p<0.0001, thus showing the statistical significance of our approach. result 0.61 0.96 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.68 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.51.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Early detection and analysis of calcifications in mammogram images is crucial in a breast cancer diagnosis workflow. Management of calcifications that require immediate follow-up and further analyzing its benignancy or malignancy can result in a better prognosis. Recent studies have shown that deep learning-based algorithms can learn robust representations to analyze suspicious calcifications in mammography. In this work, we demonstrate that randomly equalizing the histograms of calcification patches as a data augmentation technique can significantly improve the classification performance for analyzing suspicious calcifications. We validate our approach by using the CBIS-DDSM dataset for two classification tasks. The results on both the tasks show that the proposed methodology gains more than 1% mean accuracy and F1-score when equalizing the data with a probability of 0.4 when compared to not using histogram equalization. This is further supported by the t-tests, where we obtain a p-value of p<0.0001, thus showing the statistical significance of our approach.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.