REVIEW 1 cited by
Odor Descriptor Understanding through Prompting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Embeddings from contemporary natural language processing (NLP) models are commonly used as numerical representations for words or sentences. However, odor descriptor words, like "leather" or "fruity", vary significantly between their commonplace usage and their olfactory usage, as a result traditional methods for generating these embeddings do not suffice. In this paper, we present two methods to generate embeddings for odor words that are more closely aligned with their olfactory meanings when compared to off-the-shelf embeddings. These generated embeddings outperform the previous state-of-the-art and contemporary fine-tuning/prompting methods on a pre-existing zero-shot odor-specific NLP benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Molecules to Mixtures: Learning Representations of Olfactory Mixture Similarity using Inductive Biases
POMMix, a graph-based model with attention and cosine similarity heads, extends the Principal Odor Map to predict human perceptual similarity of odor mixtures, reporting a test correlation of 0.78 on a compiled datase...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.