Pith. Sign in

RECORD

(Poly)Logarithmic Time Construction of Round-optimal $n$-Block Broadcast Schedules for Broadcast and irregular Allgather in MPI

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing · Submitted 20 May 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The round-optimal schedule construction is then used to implement communication optimal algorithms for the broadcast and (irregular) allgather collective operations as found in MPI (the \emph{Message-Passing Interface}), and significantly and practically improves over the implementations in standard MPI libraries (\texttt{mpich}, OpenMPI, Intel MPI) for certain problem ranges.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2205.10072 (version 2)
Pith IDFCV3QDXJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJesper Larsson Tr\"aff. "(Poly)Logarithmic Time Construction of Round-optimal $n$-Block Broadcast Schedules for Broadcast and irregular Allgather in MPI." arXiv:2205.10072 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/FCV3QDXJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,859 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.41 · states limitation 0.44 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.54 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.99 · mentions code or data availability 0.05.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We give a fast(er), communication-free, parallel construction of optimal communication schedules that allow broadcasting of $n$ distinct blocks of data from a root processor to all other processors in $1$-ported, $p$-processor networks with fully bidirectional communication. For any $p$ and $n$, broadcasting in this model requires $n-1+\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ communication rounds. In contrast to other constructions, all processors follow the same, circulant graph communication pattern, which makes it possible to use the schedules for the allgather (all-to-all-broadcast) operation as well. The new construction takes $O(\log^3 p)$ time steps per processor, each of which can compute its part of the schedule independently of the other processors in $O(\log p)$ space. The result is a significant improvement over the sequential $O(p \log^2 p)$ time and $O(p\log p)$ space construction of Tr\"aff and Ripke (2009) with considerable practical import. The round-optimal schedule construction is then used to implement communication optimal algorithms for the broadcast and (irregular) allgather collective operations as found in MPI (the \emph{Message-Passing Interface}), and significantly and practically improves over the implementations in standard MPI libraries (\texttt{mpich}, OpenMPI, Intel MPI) for certain problem ranges. The application to the irregular allgather operation is entirely new.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We give a fast(er), communication-free, parallel construction of optimal communication schedules that allow broadcasting of $n$ distinct blocks of data from a root processor to all other processors in $1$-ported, $p$-processor networks with fully bidirectional communication. contribution 1.00 0.96 0.50 asserted 1.00
s1 For any $p$ and $n$, broadcasting in this model requires $n-1+\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ communication rounds. result 0.55 0.49 0.15 asserted 1.00
s2 In contrast to other constructions, all processors follow the same, circulant graph communication pattern, which makes it possible to use the schedules for the allgather (all-to-all-broadcast) operation as well. contribution 0.54 0.87 0.08 asserted 0.93
s3 The new construction takes $O(\log^3 p)$ time steps per processor, each of which can compute its part of the schedule independently of the other processors in $O(\log p)$ space. contribution 0.37 0.93 0.15 asserted 1.00
s4 The result is a significant improvement over the sequential $O(p \log^2 p)$ time and $O(p\log p)$ space construction of Tr\"aff and Ripke (2009) with considerable practical import. interpretation 0.72 0.46 0.17 asserted 1.00
s5 The round-optimal schedule construction is then used to implement communication optimal algorithms for the broadcast and (irregular) allgather collective operations as found in MPI (the \emph{Message-Passing Interface}), and significantly and practically improves over the implementations in standard MPI libraries (\texttt{mpich}, OpenMPI, Intel MPI) for certain problem ranges. contribution 0.62 0.91 0.44 asserted 1.00
s6 The application to the irregular allgather operation is entirely new. contribution 0.92 0.89 0.08 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We give a fast(er), communication-free, parallel construction of optimal communication schedules that allow broadcasting of $n$ distinct blocks of data from a root processor to all other processors in $1$-ported, $p$-processor networks with fully bidirectional communication. For any $p$ and $n$, broadcasting in this model requires $n-1+\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ communication rounds. In contrast to other constructions, all processors follow the same, circulant graph communication pattern, which makes it possible to use the schedules for the allgather (all-to-all-broadcast) operation as well. The new construction takes $O(\log^3 p)$ time steps per processor, each of which can compute its part of the schedule independently of the other processors in $O(\log p)$ space. The result is a significant improvement over the sequential $O(p \log^2 p)$ time and $O(p\log p)$ space construction of Tr\"aff and Ripke (2009) with considerable practical import. The round-optimal schedule construction is then used to implement communication optimal algorithms for the broadcast and (irregular) allgather collective operations as found in MPI (the \emph{Message-Passing Interface}), and significantly and practically improves over the implementations in standard MPI libraries (\texttt{mpich}, OpenMPI, Intel MPI) for certain problem ranges. The application to the irregular allgather operation is entirely new.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • To first demonstrate the practical impact of the improvement from $O(log^3 p)$ time steps (per processor) which was the bound given in [ref] to $O(logp)$ steps per processor as shown here, we run the two algorithms for different ranges of processors $p$.

    Round-optimal $n$-Block Broadcast Schedules in Logarithmic Time · Empirical Results · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.