REVIEW 4 cited by
Spiking Neural Operators for Scientific Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The main computational task of Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) is function regression, required both for inputs as well as outputs of a simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and neural operators (such as DeepONet) have been very effective in solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), but they tax computational resources heavily and cannot be readily adopted for edge computing. Here, we address this issue by considering Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), which have shown promise in reducing energy consumption by two orders of magnitude or more. We present a SNN-based method to perform regression, which has been a challenge due to the inherent difficulty in representing a function's input domain and continuous output values as spikes. We first propose a new method for encoding continuous values into spikes based on a triangular matrix in space and time, and demonstrate its better performance compared to the existing methods. Next, we demonstrate that using a simple SNN architecture consisting of Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) activation and two dense layers, we can achieve relatively accurate function regression results. Moreover, we can replace the LIF with a trained Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network and obtain comparable results but three times faster. Then, we introduce the DeepONet, consisting of a branch (typically a Fully-connected Neural Network, FNN) for inputs and a trunk (also a FNN) for outputs. We can build a spiking DeepONet by either replacing the branch or the trunk by a SNN. We demonstrate this new approach for classification using the SNN in the branch, achieving results comparable to the literature. Finally, we design a spiking DeepONet for regression by replacing its trunk with a SNN, and achieve good accuracy for approximating functions as well as inferring solutions of differential equations.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Hybrid variable spiking graph neural networks for energy-efficient scientific machine learning
Hybrid variable spiking graph neural networks match vanilla GNN accuracy on three mechanics regression tasks while reducing spike-based communication.
-
Neural Network Modeling of Microstructure Complexity Using Digital Libraries
A leaky integrate-and-fire spiking network matches or beats recurrent convolutional networks on simulated crack growth and Turing pattern prediction while using far fewer parameters.
-
Operator Learning for Reconstructing Flow Fields from Sparse Measurements: an Energy Transformer Approach
An Energy Transformer reconstructs full flow fields from patch-masked observations with only 10% of patches visible, achieving relative errors of 0.04 to 0.27 across three fluid mechanics datasets.
-
Distribution free uncertainty quantification in neuroscience-inspired deep operators
Conformalized randomized prior operators give per-location calibrated uncertainty intervals for wavelet and spiking wavelet neural operators, with a Gaussian process extension for zero-shot super-resolution UQ.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.